2001
DOI: 10.1070/qe2001v031n01abeh001886
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficient chemical oxygen — iodine laser with a high total pressure of the active medium

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, high diffuser efficiency is not expected [6]. We are now exploring 'Ejector-COIL' which can deliver high-pressure recovery [7,8].…”
Section: High Presure Supersonic Coilmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Therefore, high diffuser efficiency is not expected [6]. We are now exploring 'Ejector-COIL' which can deliver high-pressure recovery [7,8].…”
Section: High Presure Supersonic Coilmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Different types of ejector nozzles have been proposed. Nikolaev et al used under-expansion high-pressure nitrogen flow to produce laser gas [1,2]. A relatively large nitrogen flow (7-11 times that of oxygen) is necessary in order to achieve 80-100 Torr of cavity Pitot pressure, because the design point of the nitrogen stagnation pressure is lower (approximately 2-5 atms) than a nitrogen condensation limit.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nikolaev et al used under-expansion high-pressure nitrogen flow to produce laser gas. 1,2) A relatively large nitrogen flow (7 to 11 times that of oxygen) is necessary in order to achieve 80 -100 Torr of cavity Pitot pressure, because the design point of the nitrogen stagnation pressure is lower (approximately 2 -5 atm) than the nitrogen condensation limit. In order to increase the nitrogen stagnation pressure, Yang et al used a strategy whereby their nozzle bank is based on two-dimensional slit nozzles, which can minimize the total pressure loss, with mixing enhancement tabs mounted at the nozzle exit plane (NEP).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%