2013
DOI: 10.3788/col201311.121102
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficient autofocus method for sequential automatic capturing of high-magnification microscopic images

Abstract: This letter presents an autofocus (AF) method to position a high-magnification microscope lens that automatically captures hundreds of images from a single moving slide. These images are taken by a mobile clinic unit in a rural location, and are later automatically processed and revised by a remote specialist. This process requires high focus precision to enable image processing techniques to achieve proper results. Low focusing times are also required for the system to be operative. We propose a novel method … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
(30 reference statements)
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We used normalized variance as focus metric and fast hill-climbing search as autofocus algorithm [22,23]. The algorithm searches a depth range with progressively smaller steps (here 20µm, 5µm and 1µm).…”
Section: Specimen Image Acquisitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We used normalized variance as focus metric and fast hill-climbing search as autofocus algorithm [22,23]. The algorithm searches a depth range with progressively smaller steps (here 20µm, 5µm and 1µm).…”
Section: Specimen Image Acquisitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This requires capturing hundredths of focused images per tissue sample (see our autofocus contributions in Ref. 6) and analyzing of these images to identify and segment cervical nuclei (see our contributions on this area in Ref. 7).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The easiest strategy for mataining the high quality focus is to find the accurate focal depth for every point or FOV of the specimen before taking the high resolution image (Bradley et al 2005). However, this method is extremely time-consuming with average hardware, because the focusing methods need the microscopic stage to move to multiple focal depths in order to find the in-focus focal depth, hence it is subject to the mechanical limitations of the stage (Tello-Mijares et al 2013). Additionally, given the main imaging sensors for high resolution and large size image acquisition often have low frame rates, focusing in on a large number of different points can lead to a significant accumulation of scan time.…”
Section: Specimen Localisationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To ensure these FOVs match exactly the tiles found from processing low resolution slide images, the mechnical stage for the microscope needs to have high positional accuracy, i.e., close to the pixel resolution of low resolution images. The focus metric used was normalised variance and for each tile, and the fast hill-climbing search method for focusing, which samples a range of focal depths with progressively smaller focal steps till a maximum focus value is found (Sun et al 2004;Tello-Mijares et al 2013). Next, we manually classify inlier FOVs that had cervical cells and outlier FOVs that contained glue, ink marker artefacts or were focused on the top of the cover-slip.…”
Section: Focus Map Ground-truth Generationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation