2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2016.06.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficient arsenate removal by magnetite-modified water hyacinth biochar

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
51
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 187 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
0
51
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As(V) adsorption capacity of a novel material Fe‐5A is relatively high (14.89 ± 1.03 mg g −1 ) in comparison with other adsorbents described in the literature, including a critical review of adsorbents for arsenic removal . Some of the materials mentioned are pure alumina (13.64 mg g −1 ), activated alumina (9.20–24 mg g −1 ), activated carbon (3.08–30.48 mg g −1 ), bauxsol (1.081 mg g −1 ), activated bauxsol (7.642 mg g −1 ), gibbsite (4.60 mg g −1 ), goethite (12.5 mg g −1 ), kaolinite (<0.23 mg g −1 ), kaolinites intercalated with triethanolamine methylammonium iodide (6.4–10.12 mg g −1 ), granular ferric hydroxide (2.3–8.5 mg g −1 ), Fe‐sericite beads (5.87 mg g −1 ), drinking water treatment solids (DWTS; 0.017–0.21 mg g −1 ), layered double hydroxides (LDH; 24–195 mg g −1 ), manganese oxide‐modified biochar (1 mg g −1 ), magnetite‐modified biochar (7.52 mg g −1 ) and FeOOH‐modified montmorillonite clay (14.24 ± 0.80 mg g −1 ) …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As(V) adsorption capacity of a novel material Fe‐5A is relatively high (14.89 ± 1.03 mg g −1 ) in comparison with other adsorbents described in the literature, including a critical review of adsorbents for arsenic removal . Some of the materials mentioned are pure alumina (13.64 mg g −1 ), activated alumina (9.20–24 mg g −1 ), activated carbon (3.08–30.48 mg g −1 ), bauxsol (1.081 mg g −1 ), activated bauxsol (7.642 mg g −1 ), gibbsite (4.60 mg g −1 ), goethite (12.5 mg g −1 ), kaolinite (<0.23 mg g −1 ), kaolinites intercalated with triethanolamine methylammonium iodide (6.4–10.12 mg g −1 ), granular ferric hydroxide (2.3–8.5 mg g −1 ), Fe‐sericite beads (5.87 mg g −1 ), drinking water treatment solids (DWTS; 0.017–0.21 mg g −1 ), layered double hydroxides (LDH; 24–195 mg g −1 ), manganese oxide‐modified biochar (1 mg g −1 ), magnetite‐modified biochar (7.52 mg g −1 ) and FeOOH‐modified montmorillonite clay (14.24 ± 0.80 mg g −1 ) …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nitrate salts of heavy metal ions were dissolved and diluted to prepare heavy metal ion stock solutions (1 g L −1 ). Water hyacinth, one of the most aggressive invasive species of aquatic plants worldwide 51 , was selected as the feedstock for BC and collected from Yiyang River, Yangzhou, China.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most commonly used modification methods were Fe/Mn oxides and nanoscale zero-valent iron supported biochars for As removal. The mechanisms for higher As removal capacities by modified biochar included more adsorption sites for arsenic(V) removal, ligand exchange between As(V) anion, the hydroxylated surface, and H bond (Wang et al 2016(Wang et al , 2017dYoon et al 2017;Zhang et al 2016a;Zhou et al 2017c). Similarly, the most popular modification methods were Fe/Mn oxides and nanoscale zero-valent iron-supported biochars for Cr(VI) removal (Dong et al 2017;Duan et al 2017;Qian et al 2017;Su et al 2016;Wang et al 2017a).…”
Section: Heavy Metals' Immobilizationmentioning
confidence: 99%