2021
DOI: 10.1145/3478513.3480557
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficient and robust discrete conformal equivalence with boundary

Abstract: We describe an efficient algorithm to compute a discrete metric with prescribed Gaussian curvature at all interior vertices and prescribed geodesic curvature along the boundary of a mesh. The metric is (discretely) conformally equivalent to the input metric. Its construction is based on theory developed in [Gu et al. 2018b] and [Springborn 2020], relying on results on hyperbolic ideal Delaunay triangulations. Generality is achieved by considering the surface's intrinsic triangulation as a degree of freedom, an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Remark : The motorcycle complex is well‐defined only for valid seamless parametrizations in general. Their fully robust generation in 3D is a problem under broad investigation, following recent advances regarding the analogous 2D problem [ZTZC20, CSZZ19, CCS ∗ 21]. In particular because our algorithm operates on generic continuous rather than special quantized parametrizations, it was easy, though, to yield valid input parametrizations for 15 out of 19 models from [LZC ∗ 18] already with the above simple best‐effort approach following [NRP11].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Remark : The motorcycle complex is well‐defined only for valid seamless parametrizations in general. Their fully robust generation in 3D is a problem under broad investigation, following recent advances regarding the analogous 2D problem [ZTZC20, CSZZ19, CCS ∗ 21]. In particular because our algorithm operates on generic continuous rather than special quantized parametrizations, it was easy, though, to yield valid input parametrizations for 15 out of 19 models from [LZC ∗ 18] already with the above simple best‐effort approach following [NRP11].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of reduced coordinates to represent and manipulate meshes (e.g. via curvature or edge lengths) is a broad topic and has been widely studied, especially for the surface case [Campen et al 2021;Crane et al 2011]. Specifically, the aforementioned paper shows that any input polycube segmentation can be translated into a set of prescribed dihedral angles that encode the change of normal orientation along the surface.…”
Section: Polycube Mapsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While there are heuristics [Lyon et al 2016] to recover a valid hexahedral mesh even from some invalid integer-grid maps with flips, no general guarantees are available. In the 2D setting, aiming at quadrilateral mesh generation, a stream of recent work has shown ways to reliably generate flip-free maps with prescribed singularities (for instance implied by frame fields) and boundary alignment [Campen et al 2021[Campen et al , 2019Campen and Zorin 2017;Gillespie et al 2021]. It is based on phrasing the problem as a constrained metric computation problem; in a specific discrete conformal setting and formulated in per-vertex scale variables, the problem becomes convex and can be solved reliably.…”
Section: Frame Field Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Examples of custom solver details implemented in geometry processing works include manifold optimization [RS15], problem‐specific pre‐conditioning [KGL16, CBSS17, SBCK19], varying problem size [JSP17], varying variable representation [SCBK20], varying objective functions [LYNF18], alternating optimization [ESBC19], derivative manipulation and transport [SCBK20], custom line search strategies (e.g. involving mesh modifications) [CCS∗21, SCBK20], and many more. Common optimization libraries (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%