2009
DOI: 10.1891/1521-0987.10.3.100
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficient and Accurate Measurement of Physical Restraint Use in Acute Care

Abstract: Direct observation by trained observers, supplemented by nurse report and medical record documentation over brief monitoring periods, results in accurate, nonintrusive, cost-efficient estimates of physical restraint prevalence. As few as seven consecutive or nonconsecutive days in measuring restraint prevalence is sufficient to obtain accurate estimates, although the number of days may vary depending on patient mix and unit type.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Physical restraint use was defined as the presence or absence of wrist restraints on the patient and was measured during each session by direct observation, which has been shown to be an accurate and unobtrusive method of measuring physical restraints use (Fogel, Berkman, Merkel, Cranston, & Leipzig, 2009). Pain management was measured as presence or absence of pain via patient or nurse report.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Physical restraint use was defined as the presence or absence of wrist restraints on the patient and was measured during each session by direct observation, which has been shown to be an accurate and unobtrusive method of measuring physical restraints use (Fogel, Berkman, Merkel, Cranston, & Leipzig, 2009). Pain management was measured as presence or absence of pain via patient or nurse report.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It's been reported that although ICU accounts for about one-fifth of the total number of beds in hospitals, the use of physical restraints accounts for more than half of hospitals (5,6). A Canadian survey (7) on the use of physical restraint in mechanical ventilation patients have showed that about half of mechanically ventilated patients are physically restrained at least once during the period of ICU stay, with an average use of 4.1 days, of which 53% patients continue to use restraint more than 1 day.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies have reported overall physical restraint prevalence rates in the range of 50 per 1,000 patient‐days overall in acute care hospitals, with the highest rates observed in ICU settings in the United States and in Europe . Although it is likely that differences in methodologies for measuring restraint prevalence between studies cause some of the variability in restraint prevalence, there is substantial variation in the use of physical restraint use within institutions and between medical centers across the United States. This suggests that more must be done to elucidate contributing factors to further efforts aimed at decreasing the overall rate of physical restraint use …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%