2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.apm.2014.11.032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficiency status of a feasible solution in the Multi-Objective Integer Linear Programming problems: A DEA methodology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The principle of the DEA method is mainly to determine the relatively effective production frontier by means of Operations Research and Mathematical Statistics through the inputs and outputs of the DMUs that do not change and to evaluate the degree of deviation of each DMU from the DEA frontier [9]. BCC-DEA models can deal with variable returns to scale(BCC, also known as VRS) [10], which is frequently used in the analysis of port logistics efficiency where returns to scale are not constant. Through DEAP2.0 software, the technical efficiency of each port can be decomposed into scale efficiency and pure technical efficiency, which can further explore the bottlenecks restricting the improvement of technical efficiency and propose optional improvement plans.…”
Section: Dea Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The principle of the DEA method is mainly to determine the relatively effective production frontier by means of Operations Research and Mathematical Statistics through the inputs and outputs of the DMUs that do not change and to evaluate the degree of deviation of each DMU from the DEA frontier [9]. BCC-DEA models can deal with variable returns to scale(BCC, also known as VRS) [10], which is frequently used in the analysis of port logistics efficiency where returns to scale are not constant. Through DEAP2.0 software, the technical efficiency of each port can be decomposed into scale efficiency and pure technical efficiency, which can further explore the bottlenecks restricting the improvement of technical efficiency and propose optional improvement plans.…”
Section: Dea Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the literature, several versions of the ε-constraint method have appeared trying to improve its performance or adapt it to a specific type of problems like MOIP problems (Keshavarz and Toloo, 2015;Mazidi et al, 2016). The technical novelties of the AUGMECON 2 method are: (a) construction of the payoff matrix in order to calculate the ranges of every objective functions; (b) avoidance of weakly Pareto optimal solutions by transforming the objective function constraints to equalities, by explicitly incorporating the appropriate slack (for minimisation objectives) or surplus (for maximisation objectives) variables; (c) early exit from the loops in order to treat the case of infeasibilities; and (d) less computational time (Xidonas et al, 2016b).…”
Section: Pareto Optimal Frontmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Belton and Stewart (2002) found that DEA emphasises on evaluating DMUs and finding targets to improve efficiency while MCDA focuses on ranking based on a set of criteria that include subjective judgment. Liu et al (2000), and Keshavarz and Toloo (2015) used DEA technique to obtain the efficiency status of a feasible solution in MOLP. Also, Hosseinzadeh-Lotfi et al (2010), Ebrahimnejad and Hosseinzadeh-Lotfi (2012), Yang et al (2009) as well as Yang and Xu (2014) found an equivalence relationship between the envelopment CCR model, proposed by Charnes et al (1978), and the weighted min-max MOLP formulation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%