2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.egyr.2019.03.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficiency, quality, and environmental impacts: A comparative study of residential artificial lighting

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Eventually, however, the purchase price will decline, and the new technologies will be more competitive [66,67], and consequently have a shorter PB time compared with light sources with lower luminous efficacy. Indeed, more recent studies demonstrate that LED is a more economical beneficial alternative compared to more traditional light sources e.g., [69][70][71].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Eventually, however, the purchase price will decline, and the new technologies will be more competitive [66,67], and consequently have a shorter PB time compared with light sources with lower luminous efficacy. Indeed, more recent studies demonstrate that LED is a more economical beneficial alternative compared to more traditional light sources e.g., [69][70][71].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the analyzed study case an improvement of energy efficiency of 41% could be identified. Regarding the energy saving for lighting, the LED systems are 5% to 20% more efficient compared with compact fluorescent light systems [48]. A saving potential of 10% has been assumed for calculating the effect of LED on the electricity consumption of the whole system.…”
Section: Planning Actions For Nzess In a German Data Centermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was considered only LED bulbs for the simulations. It is a fact that increasingly LED bulbs will replace other types of bulbs and that the future scenarios show that this is the way [3], [4].…”
Section: Cfl and Led Brand Bmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The lighting systems consumption represents around 20% of the worldwide electrical energy consumption, as well as in the United States of America [1], [2]. The concerns around energy savings encouraged the replacing of the incandescent bulbs for others modern lighting technologies, such as Compact Fluorescent Lamps (CFL) and Light Emitting Diode devices (LED) [3]. Furthermore, incandescent bulbs were banned in some countries, for instance in Brazil, Canada, China, United States and member states of the European Union [4], [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%