2012
DOI: 10.1109/twc.2011.111211.101963
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficiency of Wireless Networks under Different Hopping Strategies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
38
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…which proves the first inequality of (14). The second inequality comes directly from the comparison of (12) and (13), which shows that the ADORP is always larger or equal to the DORP.…”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 54%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…which proves the first inequality of (14). The second inequality comes directly from the comparison of (12) and (13), which shows that the ADORP is always larger or equal to the DORP.…”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…1 depicts the ADORP as a function of the ALOHA transmission probability, for a system with a path loss exponent of 3.3. The figure compares the performance of the SO scheme to the performance of two previously published geographical routing schemes, the Nearest-neighbor scheme and Most-Progress-within-a-Radius (MPR) scheme [14]. As can be seen, the proposed SO scheme significantly outperforms the two other routing schemes.…”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Accordingly, the spatial density of potential D2D transmitters can be determined as (1 − ρ 1)λu. Therefore, the density of successful D2D links can be approximated as the density of active D2D transmitters or active D2D receivers, and then (3) can be obtained (Theorem 2 in [14]). …”
Section: Densities Of Users Establishing Cellular Links and D2d Linksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The basic problem of whether direct transmission or multihop routing strategy increases the performance in multi-hop wireless networks is investigated in the literature from several aspects [12,14,28,8,21,22,2,19], however none of these studies consider the effect of traffic arrival distributions. These studies assume either saturated traffic sources, where the nodes always have a packet waiting to be transmitted (due to capacity related concerns with optimal link scheduling and optimal routing assumptions), or assume the Poisson traffic arrival distribution only, omitting the effect of different traffic arrivals on the performance results.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%