2022 E-Health and Bioengineering Conference (EHB) 2022
DOI: 10.1109/ehb55594.2022.9991581
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficiency of Two Different Types of Upper Bonded Retainers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 17 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Rabia Adanur-Atmaca et al [38] investigated the stability of lingual retainers and reported no clinically significant worsening of periodontal health or relapse in any group. Eduard Radu Cernei et al [39] compared two upper-bonded retainer systems (Splinx and Ortho-FlexTech) and found a lower relapse rate with the Ortho-FlexTech retainer. Kocher et al [44] evaluated different lingual retainers and one upper retainer type.…”
Section: Bonded Retainers Comparedmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rabia Adanur-Atmaca et al [38] investigated the stability of lingual retainers and reported no clinically significant worsening of periodontal health or relapse in any group. Eduard Radu Cernei et al [39] compared two upper-bonded retainer systems (Splinx and Ortho-FlexTech) and found a lower relapse rate with the Ortho-FlexTech retainer. Kocher et al [44] evaluated different lingual retainers and one upper retainer type.…”
Section: Bonded Retainers Comparedmentioning
confidence: 99%