1996
DOI: 10.1007/bf02415741
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficiency of transmutation of long-lived radiotoxicity in different nuclear plants

Abstract: The initial data for performing investigations directed toward elimination (transmutation) of radioactive wastes are the amount and composition of the long-lived nuclides contained in them. The results of a calculation of these characteristics depending on the scenario of development of nuclear power are presented in [1]. It is obvious that to determine the optimal transmutation, its efficiency in different types of nuclear plants, including both thermal and fast power reactors, must be compared already at the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…4 describe this process. It should be noted that neptunium, americium, and curium are mainly long-lived α-emitters, i.e., they possess radiotoxicity, the toxicity most dangerous to man [4]. For this reason, the possibility of salvaging them usefully in a closed fuel cycle is attractive.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…4 describe this process. It should be noted that neptunium, americium, and curium are mainly long-lived α-emitters, i.e., they possess radiotoxicity, the toxicity most dangerous to man [4]. For this reason, the possibility of salvaging them usefully in a closed fuel cycle is attractive.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3) the addition to enriched uranium all isotopes of neptunium, americium, and curium, produced in power reactors of any type, in a closed fuel cycle permits maintaining a constant level of radiotoxicity, determined by the long-lived α-emitting nuclides, which otherwise accumulate in long-term storage facilities for spent fuel of nuclear reactors [4].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%