1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0275-5408(97)00022-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficiency of the Ishihara test for identifying red-green colour deficiency

Abstract: The Ishihara test is the most widely used screening test for red-green colour deficiency. Results obtained by 401 people with red-green colour deficiency show that the combined sensitivity of the Transformation and Vanishing plates of the 38 plate Edition of the Ishihara plates is 95.5% on eight errors, 97.5% on six errors and 99.0% on three errors. The Hidden digit designs only identified approximately 50% of colour-deficient subjects. The protan/deutan classification plates were found to be more effective fo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
46
2
2

Year Published

2000
2000
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
1
46
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…All subjects presented no taste or olfactory deficits and they had normal or superior colour vision discrimination according to the Farnsworth-Munsell 100 Hue Test (GretagMacbeth Ltd., Preston Brook, UK) and Ishihara test (Birch, 1997). Moreover, they presented no hearing deficiency at 4000 Hz (Hou & Dai, 2004).…”
Section: Subjectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All subjects presented no taste or olfactory deficits and they had normal or superior colour vision discrimination according to the Farnsworth-Munsell 100 Hue Test (GretagMacbeth Ltd., Preston Brook, UK) and Ishihara test (Birch, 1997). Moreover, they presented no hearing deficiency at 4000 Hz (Hou & Dai, 2004).…”
Section: Subjectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As Birch [1997] states, many of the errors made by the color-normals on the Ishihara test are not usually typical of errors made by color-defectives and an experienced clinician would not have much of a problem interpreting their results. However, the FRA uncovered problems by interpreting the patients' responses and concluded``it may not be prudent to allow examiners any discretion in interpreting a patient's response.''…”
Section: Comparison With the Ishihara Testmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reason for this comparison is that the FRA criteria for passing most editions of the Ishihara test are more stringent than typically recommended for clinical use. The FRA failure criterion for all editions is errors on over 18% of the screening plates, whereas others allow errors ranging from 23% to 38% [Hackman and Holtzman, 1992;Johnson, 1992;Birch, 1997]. For the 38 plate edition of the Ishihara test, these percentage scores translate into four or more errors for the FRA as compared to values ranging from ®ve to eight or more errors for the others.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This test is known to have excellent sensitivity and specifi city for screening purposes. 2,3 Because of problems concerning the availability and suitability of new color vision tests for young children and individuals with low cognitive ability, we undertook to reevaluate the effi cacy of the Ishihara test in preschool children.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%