2004
DOI: 10.1002/jcc.20131
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficiency of the algorithms for the calculation of Slater molecular integrals in polyatomic molecules

Abstract: The performances of the algorithms employed in a previously reported program for the calculation of integrals with Slater-type orbitals are examined. The integrals are classified in types and the efficiency (in terms of the ratio accuracy/cost) of the algorithm selected for each type is analyzed. These algorithms yield all the one- and two-center integrals (both one- and two-electron) with an accuracy of at least 12 decimal places and an average computational time of very few microseconds per integral. The alg… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
29
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 92 publications
2
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition the code accepts both GTO and STO basis sets; for the latter basis the many-center integrals are obtained with the SMILES code. 41 The code features such as computations of HF, HL, HF-HL, MC-HF, MC-HL, and MC-HF-HL wave functions are detailed elsewhere. 42,43 …”
Section: Computational Detailsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition the code accepts both GTO and STO basis sets; for the latter basis the many-center integrals are obtained with the SMILES code. 41 The code features such as computations of HF, HL, HF-HL, MC-HF, MC-HL, and MC-HF-HL wave functions are detailed elsewhere. 42,43 …”
Section: Computational Detailsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Gauss transform methods are more involved and use some integral representations in order to transform STO into a more computationally convenient form. The initial proposition of Shavitt and Karplus [27][28][29] was to use the Laplace transform of the exponential function but now a handful of different schemes is in use, along with suitable discretization techniques [30].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 Full configuration interaction ͑CI͒ computations within the Born-Oppenheimer ͑BO͒ approximation are performed with extended Slater and Gaussian basis sets. In our computer code for nonorthogonal CI, 3 the integrals with Slater-type function ͑STF͒ functions are calculated by the SMILES code developed by Fernandez Rico et al 4 Discussions on the basis sets and details of the techniques used to analyze the computed wave functions and energies, when common to the work in Refs. 1 and 2, are only summarized.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, in the 3 ⌺ g + manifold, note the barriers in states 2 and 5-10 after the internuclear distance of 4 bohrs. For the 3 ⌺ u + manifold, note the bumps for states [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14]. Note in addition the crossings for the 3 ⌺ g + manifold, immediately before the equilibrium distance, between states 2 and 3, 4 and 5, and the very close energies for the three states 11-13.…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%