Efficiency of Selenite Cystine and TT Enrichment Broths for the Detection of <i>Salmonella</i>

Bailey, J. S.; Cox, N. A.; Thomson, James E.

doi:10.1111/j.1365-2672.1981.tb01260.x

Cited by 14 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 21 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…typhi. The scanty growth of salmonellas in TB/43 could be due to the potential toxicity of this medium on the growth of these micro-organisms ; this hypothesis agrees with the results obtained by Vassiliadis et al (1974), Harvey and Price (1979), Bailey et al (1981) and D'Aoust (1981.…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 90%

Laboratory study of several enrichment broths for the detection of Salmonella spp. particularly in relation to water samples

Moriñigo

Muñoz

Martínez-Manzanares

et al. 1993

Journal of Applied Bacteriology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The selectivity and efficiency of several enrichment broths used for the the detection of salmonellas were comparatively evaluated under laboratory and environmental conditions. Media with selenite were less efficient in their inhibition of the growth of Gram-positive micro-organisms. Salmonellas grew slowly in tetrathionate broth and in media containing brilliant green. These media inhibited the growth of Salmonella typhi, which grew only in media containing selenite. The results obtained in the experiments with stressed salmonellas indicate that the media selenite F, selenite F with novobiocin, selenite cystine and Rappaport-Vassiliadis (RV/43), in conjunction with the double agar layer technique, showed an optimal efficiency for the detection of stressed salmonellas. When natural samples (freshwater and seawater) were used to evaluate the media, however, those containing malachite green, whether or not supplemented with sodium novobiocin, enhanced the recovery of salmonellas.

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 90%

Laboratory study of several enrichment broths for the detection of Salmonella spp. particularly in relation to water samples

Moriñigo

Muñoz

Martínez-Manzanares

et al. 1993

Journal of Applied Bacteriology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…TB medium manufactured by BBL performed somewhat better than TB from the other four manufacturers, but the number of positive recoveries was small and thus unreliable for comparative purposes. Overall, SC appeared superior to TB for recovery of Salmonella from chicken samples, which is consistent with results reported previously (2,4).…”

Section: Salmonellasupporting

confidence: 91%

Comparison of Brands of Media for Isolating Bacteria from Poultry, Beef and Shrimp

Lillard

Cox

Bailey

et al. 1984

Journal of Food Protection

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Five brands of media (BBL, Difco, Gibco, Oxoid and Scott) were evaluated for enumerating microorganisms by the aerobic plate count and by Enterobacteriaceae, Escherichia coli, and coliform counts, and for determining Salmonella incidence. Microbiological evaluations were done on raw chickens, raw beef and raw shrimp, except that Salmonella incidence was not determined on shrimp samples. There were statistically significant differences in total plate counts (with chicken, beef and shrimp), Enterobacteriaceae counts (with shrimp) coliforms (with chicken) and E. coli counts (with chicken) by the five brands of media, but these differences were too small to be of practical significance. It was concluded that no differences of practical significance were found among the five brands of media.

show abstract

“…Knowing what types of Enterobacteriaceae are present could be an important factor in determining the most effective bacteriological procedures for recovery of Salmonella from these materials. It has been demonstrated that the types of competing bacteria present may affect the recovery of Salmonella and that these are an important factor to consider in selecting the most effective enrichment media (Hugues et al, 1978;Bailey et al (1981). E. coli are normally present in the chicken gut in large (Cox et al, 1975(Cox et al, , 1979.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Salmonella and Other Enterobacteriaceae Found in Commercial Poultry Feed

et al. 1983

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Poultry feed (mash and pelleted) and meat and bone meal samples were collected from commercial mills. All samples were analyzed for Enterobacteriaceae count (ENT) and Salmonella. The genus and species of the various Enterobacteriaceae present were also determined. The average ENT for mash, pelleted, and meal samples was log 4.1, .8, and 1.8/g, respectively. Enterobacteriaceae were present in 100, 60, and 92% and Salmonella in 58, 0, and 92% of the mash, pelleted, and meal samples, respectively. Overall, the Enterobacteriaceae most frequently isolated from all samples were Enterobacter agglomerans, Enterobacter cloacae, and Klebsiella pneumoniae. Although no Salmonella were found in the pelleted samples, the presence of other Enterobacteriaceae suggests that commercial pelleting may not totally destroy Salmonella since their heat resistance is similar to the other organisms found.

show abstract

Efficiency of Selenite Cystine and TT Enrichment Broths for the Detection of Salmonella

Cited by 14 publications

References 21 publications

Laboratory study of several enrichment broths for the detection of Salmonella spp. particularly in relation to water samples

Laboratory study of several enrichment broths for the detection of Salmonella spp. particularly in relation to water samples

Comparison of Brands of Media for Isolating Bacteria from Poultry, Beef and Shrimp

Salmonella and Other Enterobacteriaceae Found in Commercial Poultry Feed

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About