2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodres.2016.09.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficiency of population-dependent sulfite against Brettanomyces bruxellensis in red wine

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Concentrations of 0.2 to 0.5 mg.L -1 molecular SO 2 are typically reported to inhibit growth in wine ( Conterno et al, 2006 ; Barata et al, 2008 ). However, some B. bruxellensis strains were shown to be rather sulfite tolerant ( Barata et al, 2008 ; Vigentini et al, 2008 ; Curtin et al, 2012 ; Agnolucci et al, 2014 ; Avramova et al, 2018 ) and sulfite efficiency was elucidated as population level dependent ( Longin et al, 2016 ). Previous studies highlighted genotype-dependent tolerance to sulfur dioxide for B. bruxellensis among Australian isolates with AFLP markers ( Curtin et al, 2012 ), and this was recently confirmed for 39 isolates analyzed with microsatellite markers ( Avramova et al, 2018 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Concentrations of 0.2 to 0.5 mg.L -1 molecular SO 2 are typically reported to inhibit growth in wine ( Conterno et al, 2006 ; Barata et al, 2008 ). However, some B. bruxellensis strains were shown to be rather sulfite tolerant ( Barata et al, 2008 ; Vigentini et al, 2008 ; Curtin et al, 2012 ; Agnolucci et al, 2014 ; Avramova et al, 2018 ) and sulfite efficiency was elucidated as population level dependent ( Longin et al, 2016 ). Previous studies highlighted genotype-dependent tolerance to sulfur dioxide for B. bruxellensis among Australian isolates with AFLP markers ( Curtin et al, 2012 ), and this was recently confirmed for 39 isolates analyzed with microsatellite markers ( Avramova et al, 2018 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For years, SO 2 has been employed as chemical preservative by winemakers for its antioxidant and microbiostatic properties (Divol et al 2012 , Zuehlke et al 2013 ), and it is the most commonly added preservative to grape must and wine to limit the development of B. bruxellensis and other unwanted microorganisms (Couto et al 2005 , Oelofse et al 2008 ). The response of B. bruxellensis to SO 2 has been extensively studied (Longin et al 2016 ) and various surviving strategies have been reported including sulfur reduction, acetaldehyde production, active sulfur efflux, and ability of this yeast to enter in a viable but not culturable (VBNC) state (Serpaggi et al 2012 ; Divol et al 2012 ; Capozzi et al 2016 ). During the VBNC state, the yeast cells are able to remain viable while temporarily losing their ability to proliferate on culture media (Capozzi et al 2016 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the wine industry, SO 2 is one of the most widely used additives due to its antimicrobial and antioxidant properties [29]. In general, the concentration of mSO 2 used to prevent the growth of B. bruxellensis ranges from 0.2 to 0.8 mg L −1 [30,31]. The kinetic response of the fifteen identified strains was evaluated in synthetic minimum (YNB) and synthetic media supplemented with 0.3 or 0.6 mg L −1 of mSO 2 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this cannot apply to processes contaminated with L-2676 or L-2679 clonal groups. The existence of allotriploidy and genotype diversity in B. bruxellensis has been linked to high tolerance to SO 2 [31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38], and has been attributed to the selection that occurs when adding this antimicrobial to the wide range of fermented beverages. If allotriploidy is the key factor in these two strains, this is a matter that requires further investigation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%