2015
DOI: 10.1007/s11270-015-2317-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficiency of Microfiltration Systems for the Removal of Bacterial and Viral Contaminants from Surface and Rainwater

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Li et al (2014) found that copper-zeolite filter media could reach a high removal efficiency of bacteria in rainwater, and the copper leaching was 9 μg/L. Dobrowsky et al (2015) evaluated the efficiency of microfiltration systems for the treatment of harvested rainwater. Results showed a good removal performance of heterotrophic bacteria and coliform, but viruses and adenovirus were not effectively removed by the filtration system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Li et al (2014) found that copper-zeolite filter media could reach a high removal efficiency of bacteria in rainwater, and the copper leaching was 9 μg/L. Dobrowsky et al (2015) evaluated the efficiency of microfiltration systems for the treatment of harvested rainwater. Results showed a good removal performance of heterotrophic bacteria and coliform, but viruses and adenovirus were not effectively removed by the filtration system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the detection and quantification of Legionella spp., Acanthamoeba spp., N. fowleri and V. vermiformis total gDNA was extracted from pasteurized (68 °C, 74 °C, 84 °C, 93 °C) and the corresponding unpasteurized tank water samples. For this, 1 l of each sample was first subjected to flocculation as previously described by Dobrowsky et al [ 54 ]. Briefly, 2 ml of CaCl 2 (1 M) and 2 ml of Na 2 HPO 4 (1 M) were added to each sample before the samples were stirred (room temperature) for 5 min.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Samples (2 L) were taken aseptically from each of the five heaters in sterile screw-top glass bottles from cold water taps 3 min after opening (CT), hot water taps directly after opening whilst water is still cold (HT1) and hot water taps after running at maximum heat for 1 min (HT2). Water was transported immediately to the laboratory and processed within 1 h. Microbial cells in the samples were concentrated by filtration (2 L) and released from the filters into suspension by incubation in an acidic buffer according to Dobrowsky et al (2015). The samples were flocculated by the addition of 2 mL/L CaCl 2 (1M) and 2 mL/L Na 2 HPO 4 (1M) and subsequent stirring (5 min).…”
Section: Distribution System Sampling and Molecular Quantificationmentioning
confidence: 99%