Nucleation and Atmospheric Aerosols 2007
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4020-6475-3_5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficiency of Immersion Mode Ice Nucleation on Surrogates of Mineral Dust

Abstract: A differential scanning calorimeter (DSC) was used to explore heterogeneous ice nucleation of emulsified aqueous suspensions of two Arizona test dust (ATD) samples with particle diameters of nominally 0-3 and 0-7 µm, respectively. Aqueous suspensions with ATD concentrations of 0.01-20 wt% have been investigated. The DSC thermograms exhibit a homogeneous and a heterogeneous freezing peak whose intensity ratios vary with the ATD concentration in the aqueous suspensions. Homogeneous freezing temperatures are in g… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
96
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(104 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
8
96
0
Order By: Relevance
“…J het is defined as the number of nucleation events per unit surface area of solid material per unit time. Note that J het is referred to as both a rate [ Pruppacher and Klett , 1997; Martin , 2000; Hung et al , 2003; Parsons et al , 2004a, 2004b; Archuleta et al , 2005; Pant et al , 2006] and a rate coefficient [ Dymarska et al , 2006; Marcolli et al , 2007] in the literature. The heterogeneous nucleation rate is related to the onset data through : where ω is the number of ice crystals nucleated, A s is the total mineral dust surface area available for heterogeneous nucleation, and t is the observation time.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…J het is defined as the number of nucleation events per unit surface area of solid material per unit time. Note that J het is referred to as both a rate [ Pruppacher and Klett , 1997; Martin , 2000; Hung et al , 2003; Parsons et al , 2004a, 2004b; Archuleta et al , 2005; Pant et al , 2006] and a rate coefficient [ Dymarska et al , 2006; Marcolli et al , 2007] in the literature. The heterogeneous nucleation rate is related to the onset data through : where ω is the number of ice crystals nucleated, A s is the total mineral dust surface area available for heterogeneous nucleation, and t is the observation time.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Larger IN particles have more and better active sites than smaller ones, which is why they are more likely to have a highernucleating efficiency. The natural singular character of IN emerges from the probability distribution of nucleation efficiencies, and hence of characteristic freezing temperatures, among IN particles (e.g., Marcolli et al 2007). This distribution of nucleation efficiencies arises from that of the "contact angle" (i.e., suitability of an individual site to trigger nucleation) among active sites on IN particles.…”
Section: B Relation Of Numbers Of Active In To Total Surface Area Ofmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The number mixing ratio of aerosols in group X is n X . This minimum value of IN diameter (0.1 m) has been introduced because central (aerosol) residual particles of snow crystals have been observed to be usually larger than that size (e.g., Pruppacher and Klett 1997;Chen et al 1998;Prenni et al 2007a; see also Marcolli et al 2007). Here, ⍀ X,1,* is the component of ⍀ X due to aerosols with diameters between 0.1 and 1 m in the background-troposphere scenario.…”
Section: ) General Equations Of Source Of Crystal Number For Any Aermentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As a consequence, the freezing properties of these mixtures are very different; each component could have its own characteristic freezing threshold depending on chemical and/or microphysical properties. It is know from laboratory studies that the size of IN also plays a crucial role; larger particles activate as ice crystals at lower relative humidities than smaller particles [ Pruppacher and Klett , 1997; Archuleta et al , 2005; Kanji and Abbatt , 2006; Marcolli et al , 2007]. A priori, it is not clear how these different heterogeneous IN properties will affect homogeneous nucleation occurring later within the same environment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%