2016
DOI: 10.3989/scimar.04252.13a
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficiency of artificial collectors for quantitative assessment of sea urchin settlement rates

Abstract: Summary:We tested the suitability of three different kinds of artificial collectors designed for quantitative assessment of echinoid settlement rates: (1) nylon nets containing plastic biofilter balls, (2) vertical scrub brushes with vegetal bristles and (3) horizontal triangular mats of coconut fibre. We measured the collecting efficiency by counting the number of post-larvae of two sea urchin species (Paracentrotus lividus and Arbacia lixula) gathered by each collector and deployed in two geographic areas: T… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
(73 reference statements)
0
7
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These comparisons were based on 90 replicates per settlement collector (three samples per settlement collector monitored twice a month during three months and at five locations) except for the panels which had only one collector per location (and therefore yielding only 30 replicates). To determine the coefficient of variation, a measure of reproducibility (Balsalobre et al 2016), the standard deviation of each treatment was divided by the mean, using the subset of the data containing the months with high settlement (June-August).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These comparisons were based on 90 replicates per settlement collector (three samples per settlement collector monitored twice a month during three months and at five locations) except for the panels which had only one collector per location (and therefore yielding only 30 replicates). To determine the coefficient of variation, a measure of reproducibility (Balsalobre et al 2016), the standard deviation of each treatment was divided by the mean, using the subset of the data containing the months with high settlement (June-August).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studying settlement rates is also meaningful for other purposes, as the collected settlers can be used for D. antillarum restoration . While the effectiveness of settlement collectors has been studied for other sea urchins (Balsalobre et al 2016), it is unknown which substrate is most effective for D. antillarum settlement. It is also essential to deploy collectors at the right time of the year, as settlement is characterized by distinct peaks .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More recently, Balsalobre et al (2016) assessed the suitability of artificial collectors to measure settlement rates of Paracentrotus lividus and Arbacia lixula, with the authors recommending the use of plastic bio-balls for future studies on the quantification of settlement rates (Balsalobre et al 2016).…”
Section: Sea Urchin Settlement In Artificial Collectorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The magnitude and timing of echinoderm settlement pulses also differ between species, which has been attributed to species-specific processes rather than environmental variables (Balch & Scheibling 2000, Jennings & Hunt 2010). Most of the previous studies have focused on recruitment patterns of sea urchins (Cameron & Schroeter 1980, Ebert et al 1994, Morgan et al 2000, Balsalobre et al 2016. Less attention has been paid to recruitment patterns in the field of other echinoderm groups (Barker & Nichols 1983, Black & Moran 1991, Turon et al 2000, with the exception of the corallivore sea star Acanthaster planci (Zann et al 1987, Fisk 1992, Keesing & Halford 1992 and the temperate starfish…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…López et al (1998), on the other hand, scraped off the basal layer of crustose algae within a quadrat to sample newly settled Paracentrotus lividus. Other studies have used different types of artificial collectors, such as plastic pipes (Harrold et al 1991, light diffusers (Bak 1985, Rogers & Lorenzen 2016, scrub brushes (Ebert et al 1994, Hereu et al 2004), artificial grass (Balch & Scheibling 2000, Lambert & Harris 2000, Jennings & Hunt 2010) and plastic bio-balls, originally used as biofilters in aquaria (Keesing et al 1993, Hernández et al 2006, Balsalobre et al 2016. In general, artificial collectors have the advantage of quantifying settlement at frequent intervals, and reducing the effect of predation and migration (Balch & Scheibling 2000, Jennings & Hunt 2010.…”
Section: Quantifying Recruitment In the Fieldmentioning
confidence: 99%