2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.egyr.2022.11.030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficiency modeling and comparison of surface and interior permanent magnet machines for electric vehicle

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The actual and predicted power of load, wind power and photovoltaic power all come from a power grid [9]. The thermal power unit is used as a conventional power supply, with 8 units with a capacity of 5720MW.…”
Section: Data Sourcementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The actual and predicted power of load, wind power and photovoltaic power all come from a power grid [9]. The thermal power unit is used as a conventional power supply, with 8 units with a capacity of 5720MW.…”
Section: Data Sourcementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kong et al carried out a thermal analysis comparing Surface Permanent Magnet (SPM) and Interior Permanent Magnet (IPM) machines by means of high fidelity (HF) analytical model and FEA simulation. Results showed that the analytical model presented great accuracy compared to both FEA and experimental measurements [84]. A typical approach when limited data is available is to use efficiency maps of the machine.…”
Section: Electric Machinementioning
confidence: 96%