2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.promfg.2015.07.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficiency Improvement of Blood Supply Chain System Using Taguchi Method and Dynamic Simulation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
17
0
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
2
17
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Compared to the research of Zahraee et al. [48] , our study related benefits are considering transportation capacity and the possibility of substituting blood types.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Compared to the research of Zahraee et al. [48] , our study related benefits are considering transportation capacity and the possibility of substituting blood types.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Zahraee et al. [48] examined an algorithm to locate the blood centers involving blood perishing time. The objective was to minimize cost and blood shortage.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Katsaliaki (2008) conducted a specific analysis using data from National Blood Service and developed a simulation model of UK supply chain of blood products (red blood cells and blood platelet) to determine those policies which are more practical for better cost effective management of blood supply chains. Zahraee et al (2015) proposed a computer simulation model to increase blood supply chain efficiency of Finish healthcare system. Haijema et al (2007) proposed a combined Markov dynamic programming and simulation approach for production management and inventory optimization of blood platelet and applied it to a Dutch blood bank.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• Building direct relation matrix (A) based on the average of influence value from a i to a j . [10], [26], [30], [36], [38]- [42] 5 Inventory level [17], [31], [32], [39], [43], [44] 6 Tariff of service [17], [21], [34], [38], [44] 7 Quality of service [17], [21], [30], [34], [36]- [38], [40], [43] [7], [10], [21], [34], [43], [47], [52], [53] Integration of information system [20], [41], [50], [52] Delivery [32], [40], [45], [47] Education and training [10], [26], [34], [35], [38] Research & Development…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%