2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.cpc.2021.108253
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficiency gains of a multi-scale integration method applied to a scale-separated model for rapidly rotating dynamos

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Different strategies for the solution may be needed for the two different cases, since the fluctuations evolve on a much more rapid timescale than their correlation functions (which usually evolve on the same timescale as the mean flows for a QL theory). For QL DNS, strategies may be developed that make use of the separation of timescales, either by utilizing a hidden Markov model-like solver that combines a macrosolver with a large integration timestep for the slow (mean) dynamics and a microsolver for the fast dynamics (see, e.g., Tretiak et al 2022), or by exploiting the linearity of the equations for the fluctuations (Michel & Chini 2019). While the first method is a tool that works well for general situations where the timescales are well separated, even for the case where the fast dynamics is inherently nonlinear, the second method utilizes the linearity of the fast system and therefore the fact that the slow field must stay close to a state of near marginality to achieve additional efficiency.…”
Section: Methods Of Solution For Fast/slow Quasi-linear Equationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different strategies for the solution may be needed for the two different cases, since the fluctuations evolve on a much more rapid timescale than their correlation functions (which usually evolve on the same timescale as the mean flows for a QL theory). For QL DNS, strategies may be developed that make use of the separation of timescales, either by utilizing a hidden Markov model-like solver that combines a macrosolver with a large integration timestep for the slow (mean) dynamics and a microsolver for the fast dynamics (see, e.g., Tretiak et al 2022), or by exploiting the linearity of the equations for the fluctuations (Michel & Chini 2019). While the first method is a tool that works well for general situations where the timescales are well separated, even for the case where the fast dynamics is inherently nonlinear, the second method utilizes the linearity of the fast system and therefore the fact that the slow field must stay close to a state of near marginality to achieve additional efficiency.…”
Section: Methods Of Solution For Fast/slow Quasi-linear Equationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For QL DNS, strategies may be developed that make use of the separation of timescales, either by utilizing a HMM-like solver that combines a macrosolver with a large integration timestep for the slow (mean) dynamics and a microsolver for the fast dynamics (see e.g. Tretiak et al 2022) or by exploiting the linearity of the equations for the fluctuations (Michel & Chini 2019). Whilst the first method is a general tool that works well for general situations where the timescales are well separated, even for the case where the fast dynamics is inherently nonlinear, the second method utilizes the linearity of the fast system, and therefore the fact that the slow field must stay close to a state of near marginality to achieve additional efficiency.…”
Section: Methods Of Solution For Fast/slow Ql Equationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, a number of researchers addressed this issue through techniques such as model reduction, GPU programming, and replacement of lower-scale solutions with machine learning-based surrogate models (Fritzen and Hodapp 2016;Raschi et al 2021;Rocha et al 2021). HMM and EFM are similar approaches that employ a macro-scale model with large time steps, in which the primary variables evolve through the solution of a micro-scale model over smaller time steps (Tretiak et al 2022). In such models, the need for macroscopic constitutive equations is avoided, and in some cases (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In such models, the need for macroscopic constitutive equations is avoided, and in some cases (e.g. EFM) the macro-scale finite element equations also are not required (Tretiak et al 2022). As with the FE 2 approach, the main disadvantage is the computational cost (Vassaux et al 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%