2020
DOI: 10.14736/kyb-2020-4-0695
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficiency evaluation of closed-loop supply chains with proportional dual-role measures

Abstract: Institute of Mathematics of the Czech Academy of Sciences provides access to digitized documents strictly for personal use. Each copy of any part of this document must contain these Terms of use.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 56 publications
(92 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Data envelopment analysis (DEA), first developed by Charnes et al (1978), is a compelling and prevailing approach to assess the performance of entities accompanied by various inputs and outputs. After developing the basic DEA techniques (Banker et al , 1984; Charnes et al , 1978), different DEA studies, including network DEA (Färe and Grosskopf, 1996, 2000; Jahani Sayyad Noveiri et al , 2020; Jahani Sayyad Noveiri et al , 2019; Kao and Hwang, 2008; Lozano, 2015; Maghbouli et al , 2014; Noveiri et al , 2022), worst-practice-frontier DEA (Fathi et al , 2023; Rahimi et al , 2022), ranking DEA (Kordrostami et al , 2016; Mohaghar et al , 2013), interval DEA (Despotis and Smirlis, 2002; Wang et al , 2005) and inverse DEA (An et al , 2019; Emrouznejad et al , 2019; Ghiyasi, 2015; Ghiyasi and Zhu, 2020; Ghobadi, 2018; Lertworasirikul et al , 2011; Wei et al , 2000) were arisen and used to investigate the performance of decision-making units (DMUs) with disparate frameworks and various types of performance measures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data envelopment analysis (DEA), first developed by Charnes et al (1978), is a compelling and prevailing approach to assess the performance of entities accompanied by various inputs and outputs. After developing the basic DEA techniques (Banker et al , 1984; Charnes et al , 1978), different DEA studies, including network DEA (Färe and Grosskopf, 1996, 2000; Jahani Sayyad Noveiri et al , 2020; Jahani Sayyad Noveiri et al , 2019; Kao and Hwang, 2008; Lozano, 2015; Maghbouli et al , 2014; Noveiri et al , 2022), worst-practice-frontier DEA (Fathi et al , 2023; Rahimi et al , 2022), ranking DEA (Kordrostami et al , 2016; Mohaghar et al , 2013), interval DEA (Despotis and Smirlis, 2002; Wang et al , 2005) and inverse DEA (An et al , 2019; Emrouznejad et al , 2019; Ghiyasi, 2015; Ghiyasi and Zhu, 2020; Ghobadi, 2018; Lertworasirikul et al , 2011; Wei et al , 2000) were arisen and used to investigate the performance of decision-making units (DMUs) with disparate frameworks and various types of performance measures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%