2016
DOI: 10.7567/apex.9.052302
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficiency enhancement of Sb2Se3 thin-film solar cells by the co-evaporation of Se and Sb2Se3

Abstract: In this work, we present an alternative route to supply excessive selenium (Se) for the deposition of Sb2Se3 thin films by the co-evaporation of Se and Sb2Se3. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images showed that additional Se modified the growth process and surface morphology of Sb2Se3 thin films. X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns confirmed that this co-evaporation process enhanced the beneficiary preferred orientations, and capacitance–voltage (C–V) measurement showed that the carrier concentration of the Sb… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
30
1
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
30
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These diffraction peaks indicated crystallization with orthorhombic structure according to the X-ray international card (number 15-0861) [25]. This result is in agreement with that recorded previously by other authors [10,18,26]. Since EDX results proved the presence of Mn dopant with 1.95 at %, Sb has a deficiency in its atomic percent from Sb 2 Se 3 compound.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…These diffraction peaks indicated crystallization with orthorhombic structure according to the X-ray international card (number 15-0861) [25]. This result is in agreement with that recorded previously by other authors [10,18,26]. Since EDX results proved the presence of Mn dopant with 1.95 at %, Sb has a deficiency in its atomic percent from Sb 2 Se 3 compound.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Compared with the S‐3 solar cells, the apparently optimized values were obtained in the S‐5 solar cells, with improved J sc of 11.93 mA cm −2 , improved V oc of 0.637 V, reduced R s of 15 Ωcm 2 , improved R sh of 373 Ωcm 2 , and improved FF of 0.49 (Figure S6, Supporting Information shows that the best S‐5 device reached a PCE of 3.75%). One potential explanation might be the difference of sulfur deficits . As discussed in the EDX analysis, the Sb 2 S 5 precursor lead to the relatively sulfur‐rich Sb 2 S 3 films, which helped to overcome the sulfur deficit of the S‐3 film evaporated from Sb 2 S 3 precursor.…”
Section: Photovoltaic Parameters Of Best Sb2s3 Solar Cells (The Best mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Leng et al used a post‐selenization process to compensate the selenium vacancy defects in thermal‐evaporated Sb 2 Se 3 absorbers and reduced the recombination loss in the solar cells . Liu et al, as well as our group, reported an in situ selenium (Se) compensation approach . Sb 2 Se 3 films grown in a Se‐rich environment exhibited longer carrier lifetime and demonstrated lower interfacial and bulk defects.…”
Section: Device Performance Parameters Of the Pure Sb2se3 And (Sb2se3mentioning
confidence: 99%