Efficiency assessment of banking systems’ performance

Korneyev, Maxim; Berezhniuk, Ivan; Dzhyndzhoian, V.; Nebaba, Natalia; Voytov, Sergiy

doi:10.21511/bbs.17(3).2022.07

Cited by 4 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 32 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Recently, enterprises of social importance have been gaining increasing popularity as society demands a more active role in solving social problems (Korneyev et al, 2022a(Korneyev et al, , 2022b. This leads to the development of new business models that combine profitable activities with the creation of social value.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Comparative analysis of critical infrastructure and public significance enterprises

Nazarova,

Hordopolov,

Lositska

et al. 2024

Multidiscip. Rev.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The relevance of this study is due to the increasing complexity and interdependence of enterprises in terms of critical infrastructure and social importance, which play pivotal roles in ensuring societal well-being, economic stability, and environmental sustainability. As technology evolves and new threats emerge, the need for a comprehensive, regularly updated evaluation becomes imperative. This article aims to identify and disclose the key aspects of a systematic comparative assessment of enterprises in terms of critical infrastructure and social importance. The leading approach to the study employs a combination of general scientific and specialized methods, drawing on modern economic theory and concepts from renowned scholars. This article examines the main aspects of conducting a comparative assessment of the activities of enterprises of critical infrastructure and social importance. The main characteristics of enterprises with critical infrastructure and social importance, which are important in the system of comparative assessment, are determined. General aspects that can be taken into account when evaluating these enterprises are reflected. The stages of comparative assessment of the activities of enterprises of critical infrastructure and public importance are presented, and the challenges and advantages of conducting a comparative assessment of these enterprises are also defined. The materials presented in the article hold practical value for policymakers, businesses, and academics, as they offer insights into improving the efficiency, sustainability, and impact of critical infrastructure and socially important enterprises.

show abstract

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Comparative analysis of critical infrastructure and public significance enterprises

Nazarova,

Hordopolov,

Lositska

et al. 2024

Multidiscip. Rev.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…En estudios previos se aplican los tipos de frontera de producción de la banca con base en apreciaciones sobre su comportamiento más probable o sin probar cuál predomina (Haider et al, 2019;Korneyev et al, 2022;Sarmiento et al, 2018;Shi et al, 2023). Incluso, Henriques et al (2018) emplean tanto el modelo RCE como el de RVE, afirmando que en la literatura especializada no hay consenso sobre cuál modelo es mejor para evaluar las instituciones financieras.…”

Section: Sistema De Hipótesisunclassified

“…Asimismo, se estimaron las fronteras de los modelos de RCE y RVE, como ha sido reportado en otros estudios (Sarmiento et al, 2018), salvo que en la presente investigación se probó con un análisis estadístico cuál es el más apropiado, ya que en otros estudios es común que se calculen estos dos modelos de frontera sin probar cuál predomina (Haider et al, 2019;Korneyev et al, 2022). Esta demostración se hizo mediante una prueba estadística no paramétrica, con la cual se constató que hay diferencias en los modelos de RCE y RVE en la banca múltiple peruana, por lo cual prevalece el modelo de RVE, tal como lo hizo Martín (2008) al emplear el método DEA en universidades.…”

Section: Issn Online 2007-9621unclassified

Contribución de las inversiones en recursos humanos según el tipo de eficiencia técnica de la banca múltiple peruana

Flores Gutiérrez,

Castillo Inche,

Tejada Portilla

2023

Acta Universitaria

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Se evaluó la contribución de las inversiones en recursos humanos (RRHH) a la eficiencia técnica de la banca múltiple peruana durante el 2021. Además, se demostró qué tipo de frontera de producción prevalece y se generó un plan benchmarking. A una muestra censal de 16 bancos se les midieron tres inputs (remuneraciones al personal, gastos del directorio y activos) y dos outputs (total de depósitos y total de créditos vigentes). Se identificaron siete bancos en la frontera de eficiencia técnica global (ETG), 12 bancos en la de eficiencia técnica pura (ETP) y siete bancos en la de eficiencia de escala (EE). La media de la ETG fue 0.86, la de ETP fue 0.95 y la de EE fue 0.91. Se determinó que prevalecen los rendimientos variables a escala, que la eficiencia de los bancos no varía con el nivel de inversión en recursos humanos, y se formuló un plan de mejoras potenciales.

show abstract

Interdependence of the banking system development and the economic growth in the context of digitalization: Case study of Azerbaijan and its key trading partners

Tagiyeva,

Babashirinova,

Agabekova

et al. 2023

Banks and Bank Systems

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

When choosing a country as a trading partner, an important role is played by the speed, convenience, and reliability of banking services (this is primarily determined by the level of digitalization of banking activities), and the general level of economic growth of this country. The article analyzes the relationship between the efficiency of the banking system and the country’s economic growth under digitalization using the example of Azerbaijan and its key trading partners. Calculations were made using data for 2010–2021 based on World Bank, IMF, and UN statistics. Principal component analysis was used to identify the most relevant indicators that describe the stability of the banking system, the level of economic development of the country, and the level of digitalization; the method of structural modeling was used to identify functional relationships between the constructed synthetic generalizing indicators. Calculations showed that the development of the banking system is much more (almost seven times) influenced by the level of digitalization in the country than the level of economic growth (coefficients for synthetic generalizing indicators formed in the process of structural modeling are 0.29 and 0.04). Modeling proved that the focus of reforms aimed at increasing the level of digitalization in the country should be an increase in the number of electronic accounts, electronic payments, the share of the population using the Internet, growth of R&amp;D expenditures, and innovation index.

show abstract

Efficiency assessment of banking systems’ performance

Cited by 4 publications

References 32 publications

Comparative analysis of critical infrastructure and public significance enterprises

Comparative analysis of critical infrastructure and public significance enterprises

Contribución de las inversiones en recursos humanos según el tipo de eficiencia técnica de la banca múltiple peruana

Interdependence of the banking system development and the economic growth in the context of digitalization: Case study of Azerbaijan and its key trading partners

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About