“…Lastly, we assessed the energy cost of the sequential route based on future CO2 gas-fed electrolysis with no carbonate formation. Very recent reports demonstrated the potential to improve CO2 utilisation efficiency 41 by developing catalyst-membrane interface 35,42 , optimising cell operating conditions (e.g., reducing CO2 flow rates, increasing current densities, and optimising anolyte compositions and ionic strength) 37 , or supplying protons towards the cathode to regenerate CO2 from the (bi)carbonates, e.g., flowing strong acidic catholyte 20,43 , applying cation-exchange membranes 35 or bipolar membrane 42 in a reverse mode. The single-pass conversion rate remains 50% in this optimistic sequential model, meaning that 50% of the inputted CO2 feed converts to CO product and reduces the required pressureswing absorption separation energy cost.…”