2008
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-75767-2_12
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficiency and Scalability Issues in Metric Access Methods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Böhm et al [15] present another survey that explores the effects of indexing highdimensional data, focusing on both MAMs and spatial access methods. The work of Dohnal et al [16] discusses scalability issues of disk-based MAMs, and argues that parallel or distributed similarity search techniques should be employed to speed up queries over very large datasets.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Böhm et al [15] present another survey that explores the effects of indexing highdimensional data, focusing on both MAMs and spatial access methods. The work of Dohnal et al [16] discusses scalability issues of disk-based MAMs, and argues that parallel or distributed similarity search techniques should be employed to speed up queries over very large datasets.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Scalability is another important limitation for many indexing methods, that struggle to work with large datasets [25]. Indexes whose design follows a top-down data partition strategy are not prepared for big data problems in distributed systems, where it is unfeasible to centralize metadata in a single node.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, MAMs have been widely used for data retrieval in medical scenarios, so any MAM could be employed. As the Slim-tree has already been employed in the literature (DOHNAL; GENNARO;ZEZULA, 2008;OLIVEIRA et al, 2016;NESSO-JR. et al, 2018) and is implemented in the Arboretum library, this was the MAM used in the experiments. Specifically, we measured the average query time for kNN and Range queries, along with the average building time and disk space usage of the index structures, in the context of Domain Queries across multiple repositories.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%