2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2019.03.153
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficiency and heat loss analysis of honeycomb receiver varying air mass flow rate and beam width

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The emissivity (absorptivity) of the solid wall is 0.9 with assuming the gray wall of a channel. The previous work (Nakakura et al (2019)) examined the effects from grid resolution and DO separation for the case of low incident heat flux 0 = 501 kW/m 2 . The work proved that 5x5x8 and finer DO separation satisfactorily converged the numerical variables.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The emissivity (absorptivity) of the solid wall is 0.9 with assuming the gray wall of a channel. The previous work (Nakakura et al (2019)) examined the effects from grid resolution and DO separation for the case of low incident heat flux 0 = 501 kW/m 2 . The work proved that 5x5x8 and finer DO separation satisfactorily converged the numerical variables.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cell size effects analysis revealed that increasing the air mass flow deteriorated the receiver efficiency at the power over air mass (POM) kept constant but decreasing cell size recovered the efficiency (Nakakura et al, 2020). This paper is devoted to numerical analysis in the same direction as the previous works (Nakakura et al, 2017;Nakakura et al, 2018;Nakakura et al, 2019;Nakakura et al, 2020). The former papers varied air mass flow rate at the constant POM; however, this paper changes working conditions at the constant incidence flux from practical viewpoint.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In real commercial solar thermal power plant (actual and large receiver), thousands of heliostat modules are used to concentrate the incident solar radiation on the receiver surface and one volumetric solar receiver module may receive solar rays from multiple heliostats. As a result, there will be a range of incidence angle values and a dominant value is usually used in the analysis [32,[56][57][58][59]. This dominant value can be controlled by changing the tilt angle of the receiver (θ R ).…”
Section: Analysis Of Absorbed Solar Heat Flux Distributionmentioning
confidence: 99%