2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2016.12.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficiency and cost optimization of a regenerative Organic Rankine Cycle power plant through the multi-objective approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
17
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
17
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Wang et al [242,269] Thermal power plant Thermal efficiency and cost of electricity MOEA Chen et al [270] Nuclear power plant Primary flow rate, weight Hybrid NSGA-II Gimelli et al [271] Organic Rankine cycle power plant Electric efficiency, overall heat exchangers area MOGA-II Boyaghchi and Molaie [272] Combined cycle power plant Total avoidable exergy destruction rate, CO 2 emission NSGA-II…”
Section: 2016mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wang et al [242,269] Thermal power plant Thermal efficiency and cost of electricity MOEA Chen et al [270] Nuclear power plant Primary flow rate, weight Hybrid NSGA-II Gimelli et al [271] Organic Rankine cycle power plant Electric efficiency, overall heat exchangers area MOGA-II Boyaghchi and Molaie [272] Combined cycle power plant Total avoidable exergy destruction rate, CO 2 emission NSGA-II…”
Section: 2016mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The optimization approach described in this paragraph involves the coupling of the thermodynamic model of the ORC system with the evolutionary algorithm MOGA II. Starting from the assigned values of the input parameters and the ORC system model deeply discussed in [35], the optimization process enabled the identification of a set of Pareto dominant solutions for the specific system configuration and application. With reference to the general scheme of the optimization process represented above in Figure 4, analyses were conducted by selecting the following two objective functions: global electric efficiency (to be maximized) :…”
Section: The Multi-objective Approach For Orc System Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The range of definition for the pressure in the decision variable space (Table 2) was limited according to the thermodynamic restrictions imposed by the hot and cool sources. More details are reported in [35]. The overall heat exchangers area and the global electric efficiency were evaluated via a 0D model of the ORC system, which became the calculation algorithm coupled with the optimization algorithm MOGA II according to the scheme shown in Figure 4.…”
Section: The Multi-objective Approach For Orc System Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Behzadi et al [14] conducted energy, exergy, and exergoeconomic analyses of an ORC unit that was coupled with a waste-to-heat plant, and found that R123 achieved the best performance for the integrated system. Gimelli et al [15] established a multi-objective optimization model of an ORC system with electric efficiency and the overall area of the heat exchangers as objective functions; in the Pareto optimal front, electric efficiency is in the range of 14.1-18.9% and the overall area of the heat exchangers rangers from 446 m 2 to 1079 m 2 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%