2002
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gnf121
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficiencies of fluorescence resonance energy transfer and contact-mediated quenching in oligonucleotide probes

Abstract: An important consideration in the design of oligonucleotide probes for homogeneous hybridization assays is the efficiency of energy transfer between the fluorophore and quencher used to label the probes. We have determined the efficiency of energy transfer for a large number of combinations of commonly used fluorophores and quenchers. We have also measured the quenching effect of nucleotides on the fluorescence of each fluorophore. Quenching efficiencies were measured for both the resonance energy transfer and… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

13
410
0
2

Year Published

2007
2007
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 587 publications
(433 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
13
410
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, the fitted value of K close , 59 ± 30, corresponds to a free energy of −10.6 (±1.4) kJ/mol for the formation of the two-mismatch-containing stem. This, in turn, agrees to within experimental uncertainty with the −12.2 (±1.6) kJ/mol predicted by adding the −4.6 kJ/mol stability of the stem as predicted by the "DINAMelt Mfold" secondary structure prediction algorithm (32,33) to the −7.6 (±1.6) kJ/mol prior literature estimates of the stabilization produced by the fluorophore-quencher pair we have used (34,35). Encouraged by these successful test case design efforts, we next adapted our simple strategy to engineering cooperativity into two structurally more complex receptors.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 83%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Moreover, the fitted value of K close , 59 ± 30, corresponds to a free energy of −10.6 (±1.4) kJ/mol for the formation of the two-mismatch-containing stem. This, in turn, agrees to within experimental uncertainty with the −12.2 (±1.6) kJ/mol predicted by adding the −4.6 kJ/mol stability of the stem as predicted by the "DINAMelt Mfold" secondary structure prediction algorithm (32,33) to the −7.6 (±1.6) kJ/mol prior literature estimates of the stabilization produced by the fluorophore-quencher pair we have used (34,35). Encouraged by these successful test case design efforts, we next adapted our simple strategy to engineering cooperativity into two structurally more complex receptors.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Specifically, Mfold (32,33) predicts that the parent aptamer forms a stem loop structure with folding free energy that is unstable by 0.75 kJ/mol (per monomeric aptamer) in the absence of doxorubicin. When added to the favorable association energy of the fluorophore-quencher pair (34,35), this yields a closing free energy of −6.1 kJ/mol and a K close of 11.2 for the tandem repeat. Inserting the latter value into Eq.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…2A). Spacing at a distance of seven bases and short linkers avoided contact quenching (24). A BLAST search was performed with the sequence of the 16-mer to minimize specific interactions with genomic DNA or messenger RNA.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…494 nm [37] Supposedly similar as free chromophore max ϭ wavelength of maximum absorption; em ϭ wavelength of maximum fluorescence emission; ex ϭ excitation wavelength; ⌽ ϭ fluorescence quantum yield;…”
Section: Minor Groovementioning
confidence: 99%