2013
DOI: 10.2140/jomms.2013.8.247
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficiencies of algorithms for vibration-based delamination detection: A comparative study

Abstract: The need for efficient and low-cost techniques adequate for damage detection has become of great interest in engineering applications where structural health monitoring (SHM) is of paramount importance. Promising algorithms for SHM have to deliver results with very low computational and response time requirements and be trustworthy within a certain accuracy. Different algorithms (artificial neural networks (ANN), response surface methodology (RSM), and optimization techniques -gradient-based local search (GBLS… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 32 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This study showed that ANN and optimization algorithms with surrogates have enormous potential for delamination-detection scenarios. Furthermore, the response surface methodology (RSM) was compared with ANN by Ihesiulor et al, 26 demonstrating that ANN is a better and more precise modeling technique than RSM because it describes nonlinearities even better. However, a better diagnostic method is explored in-depth in Todoroki and Tanaka’s 27 research comparisons of ANN and RSM.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study showed that ANN and optimization algorithms with surrogates have enormous potential for delamination-detection scenarios. Furthermore, the response surface methodology (RSM) was compared with ANN by Ihesiulor et al, 26 demonstrating that ANN is a better and more precise modeling technique than RSM because it describes nonlinearities even better. However, a better diagnostic method is explored in-depth in Todoroki and Tanaka’s 27 research comparisons of ANN and RSM.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%