2008
DOI: 10.2754/avb200877020239
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficacy Test of Trichoben Vaccine Administered to Calves at Different Intervals between Vaccination and Re-Vaccination

Abstract: The aim of the study was to test a possible extension of the period between vaccination and revaccination with the live Trichoben vaccine (Bioveta, a.s., Czech Republic). The calves (n = 61) were vaccinated intramuscularly. The intervals between vaccination and re-vaccination were 3, 5, 7, 10, 14 or 28 days. Another group of calves (n = 16) was vaccinated once with a double dose of the vaccine. The protective immunity against experimental infection with a virulent Trichophyton verrucosum CCM F-650 strain was i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although post‐vaccine clinical signs resemble virulent dermatophytosis, it is considered that these lesions are harmless but not contagious and self‐limiting, disappearing after 2–4 weeks (Lund & Deboer, 2008). Other virulence properties are assumed to stimulate the protective immune response to the vaccine (Lund & Deboer, 2008; Rybnikář et al, 2008; Wawrzkiewicz & Wawrzkiewicz, 1992). Gudding and Lund (1995) have suggested that mimicking natural infection leads to development of fully protective immunity, and cell‐mediated immune response is crucial for acquisition of sufficient immunity against ringworm.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Although post‐vaccine clinical signs resemble virulent dermatophytosis, it is considered that these lesions are harmless but not contagious and self‐limiting, disappearing after 2–4 weeks (Lund & Deboer, 2008). Other virulence properties are assumed to stimulate the protective immune response to the vaccine (Lund & Deboer, 2008; Rybnikář et al, 2008; Wawrzkiewicz & Wawrzkiewicz, 1992). Gudding and Lund (1995) have suggested that mimicking natural infection leads to development of fully protective immunity, and cell‐mediated immune response is crucial for acquisition of sufficient immunity against ringworm.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, it has been found that a single dose of the vaccine is not sufficient for the development of satisfactory immunity against trichophytosis (Rybnikář et al, 2008) . Double administration of preparations has to be recommended to obtain convenient vaccine efficacy, and the preferable interval between vaccination and re‐vaccination ranges from 10–14 days in most registered antimycotic vaccines (Lund et al, 2014; Rybnikář et al, 1998; Rybnikář et al, 2008; Wawrzkiewicz & Wawrzkiewicz, 1992). In addition, if calves are given the first dose at the age of 2–4 weeks, protective immunity will develop 6 to 8 weeks later (Wawrzkiewicz & Wawrzkiewicz, 1992).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In each of these cases, the vaccination was related to T. verrucosum dermatophytosis, although the acquired immunity was extended to trichophytoses with a different etiology [11]. Repeated administration of inactivated or attenuated preparations with a preferable 10 to 14 days interval is recommended to obtain the highest vaccine efficacy [5,11,19,20]. Interestingly, experience from natural outbreaks of ringworm in cattle has proven that the immunity is long-lasting [5,19] and that re-vaccination is not necessary [21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%