Efficacy, safety, and quality of life of generic and innovator ibrutinib in Indian CLL patients

Abstract

To report the efficacy, safety, and quality of life (QoL) on generic and innovator ibrutinib in Indian CLL patients. This was a single centre, prospective study of treatment-naive (TN), and relapsed/refractory (R/R) CLL patients receiving ibrutinib in India. The choice of innovator or generic ibrutinib was as per patient discretion. Response and adverse events were recorded as per the 2018 iwCLL guidelines and CTCAEv4.0. QoL was assessed using the EORTC QLQ-C30 and CLL17 questionnaires. A total of 32 CLL patients (TN, n = 7 and R/R, n = 25) received ibrutinib from 2016-2019. The median age was 60 years (37-84). All TN patients attained partial response without any grade 3/4 adverse events (AE). Ibrutinib was less tolerated in the R/R setting, with 52% patients developing grade 3/4 AE and required dose reduction. Eleven patients (44%) died during follow-up. Grade 3-5 infections were seen in 44% of R/R CLL patients. Generic ibrutinib (n = 8) was comparable to innovator ibrutinib (n = 17) in terms of efficacy, safety, and QoL. Ibrutinib is less well tolerated in Indian R/R CLL patients. Infections are a common cause of morbidity and mortality. This study affirms the safety and efficacy of generic ibrutinib.

Ibrutinib Plus RCHOP versus RCHOP Only in Young Patients with Activated B-Cell-like Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma (ABC-DLBCL): A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis

“…It is also notable that ibrutinib is an available drug in some jurisdictions across the world and could have an accessible price point, particularly as it approaches becoming a generic drug. Although the formulation of ibrutinib (Imbruvia ® , Pharmacyclics LLC, South San Francisco, CA, USA) has a higher price point in high-income country markets, exemplified by its cost in Canada, low-income countries such as India have achieved success in producing generic formulations at a lower cost [47,48]. However, it is worth noting that the cost remains a barrier for the patient population in India, as the generic formulations are still priced at twice the gross national income per capita [47].…”