1988
DOI: 10.1016/0304-4017(88)90151-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficacy of tropically applied ivermectin against Boophilus microplus (Canestrini, 1887) in cattle

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
1

Year Published

1992
1992
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
9
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These results compared favorably with the 99.4% reduction in tick numbers reported by Maske et al (1992) following an injection treatment with ivermectin. A previous study conducted to evaluate a single injection of ivermectin (Cramer et al 1988a) reported a lower reduction in tick numbers and reproductive capacity of treated females than the data obtained herein, while reported mean female weight and egg mass weight of treated females was comparable to our study. Caproni et al 0.0 ± 0.0 19.5 ± 29.9 * c…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 55%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These results compared favorably with the 99.4% reduction in tick numbers reported by Maske et al (1992) following an injection treatment with ivermectin. A previous study conducted to evaluate a single injection of ivermectin (Cramer et al 1988a) reported a lower reduction in tick numbers and reproductive capacity of treated females than the data obtained herein, while reported mean female weight and egg mass weight of treated females was comparable to our study. Caproni et al 0.0 ± 0.0 19.5 ± 29.9 * c…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 55%
“…Consequently, while it was clearly evident that the endectocides were highly efficacious against ticks that were infested at £ 18 d before treatment, the efficacy of the materials against ticks infested 19-20 d before treatment might be less certain. Reports of other investigations with these endectocides stating that the level of control was somewhat lower against ticks that were very near to repletion when treatment was applied support this idea (Cramer et al 1988a;Davey and George 2002).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…Because eprinomectin is efÞcacious against lone star ticks at lower levels in the serum of cattle and is eliminated from the serum at a more rapid rate than either doramectin or ivermectin, it provides an advantage for use in applications such as the medicated bait for control of ticks on white-tailed deer where quick withdrawal times are necessary because of hunting (Pound et al 2004). Because previous laboratory and Þeld trials have proven the efÞcacy of avermectins for controlling B. microplus on pastured and stanchioned cattle, it is likely that comparable treatments with eprinomectin could provide control of the B. microplus as well and may be useful in the Cattle Fever Tick Eradication Program (Campbell et al 1983, Cramer et al 1988, Gonzales et al 1993, Remington et al 1997, Caproni et al 1998, Guglielmone et al 2000, Davey et al 2001, Davey and George 2002.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Ivermectin, the Þrst of this class to be introduced, provides control of a variety of both endo-and ectoparasites, including ticks (Drummond 1985, Lasota andDybas 1991). Numerous studies have shown that ivermectin can control a variety of tick species (Drummond et al 1981;Nolan et al 1981;Lancaster et al 1982;Miller et al 1983Miller et al , 1998Pegram and Lemche 1985;Cramer et al 1988;Soll et al 1989Soll et al , 1990Taylor and Kenny 1990;Davey et al 2001). Pound et al (1996) developed technology for the delivery of ivermectin by using medicated-corn, Zea mays L., for the control of lone star ticks, Amblyomma americanum (L.) (Acari: Ixodidae).…”
mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Numerous studies have shown that ivermectin can control a variety of tick species (Drummond et al 1981. Nolan et al 1981Lancaster et al 1982;Miller et al 1983Miller et al , 1998Pegram and Lemche 1985;Cramer et al 1988;Taylor and Kenny 1990, Soll et al 1989.…”
Section: Because Of the United States Boophilus Eradicationmentioning
confidence: 98%