2020
DOI: 10.1089/mdr.2019.0326
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficacy of the Xpert MTB/RIF Assay in Multidrug-Resistant Tuberculosis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Multi-drug-resistant TB is an increasing problem in many countries with high HIV and TB burdens, although evidence suggests it is not more frequent in people living with HIV (PLHIV) [29]. Determination of drug resistance is best accomplished with mycobacterial culture, although molecular diagnostics such as Gene Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra can provide more timely diagnosis [30,31], at the cost of some missed cases of resistance [32]. Workup for alternate infectious etiologies should include blood cultures but can otherwise be guided by any localizing signs [4]; for example, worsening pulmonary symptoms should trigger consideration of Pneumocystis jirovecci pneumonia [33] or pulmonary Kaposi Sarcoma.…”
Section: Clinical Features and Diagnosismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Multi-drug-resistant TB is an increasing problem in many countries with high HIV and TB burdens, although evidence suggests it is not more frequent in people living with HIV (PLHIV) [29]. Determination of drug resistance is best accomplished with mycobacterial culture, although molecular diagnostics such as Gene Xpert MTB/RIF Ultra can provide more timely diagnosis [30,31], at the cost of some missed cases of resistance [32]. Workup for alternate infectious etiologies should include blood cultures but can otherwise be guided by any localizing signs [4]; for example, worsening pulmonary symptoms should trigger consideration of Pneumocystis jirovecci pneumonia [33] or pulmonary Kaposi Sarcoma.…”
Section: Clinical Features and Diagnosismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clearly this effect was not from prevention of TB alone; prevention of Cryptococcus meningitis IRIS in particular is a notable factor [178]. Several studies have assessed the value of empirical TB treatment compared to extensive screening or isoniazid preventative therapy in patients with advanced HIV and found no difference in major outcomes, suggesting that with truly rigorous screening it is possible to detect all but latent TB, although unmasking IRIS was not specifically assessed [179][180][181]. The role of TB preventative therapy in preventing unmasking TB-IRIS, and its implications for drug-resistant TB, require further exploration.…”
Section: Risk Factors and Preventionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar to our results, studies in Russia and South Africa found nonsignificant trends towards improved treatment outcomes with the use of Xpert assay [ 17 , 25 ]. In contrast, a large study of 952 MDR-TB patients in Kazakhstan found that the use of the Xpert versus culture-based methods was associated with a much higher rate of favorable outcomes (74 vs 49%, P < .0001) [ 26 ]. An important point to note is that our study and those mentioned above were carried out before the full implementation of new drug regimens for drug-resistant TB, which are shorter and more effective than prior second-line treatment regimens and may help realize the full impact of molecular tests among patients with drug resistance disease [ 8 , 27 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These kits only screen the amino acid sequence and not the nucleic acid sequence so silent mutations will go undetected [ 14 ]. Therefore, solitary reliance on genotypic drug resistance detection would underestimate the disease burden and drug resistance rates [ 15 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Molecular tests cannot differentiate between members of the MTB complex. They are unable to differentiate between viable and nonviable bacteria DNA; hence, they cannot be used for monitoring the progression or success of treatment of patients with ATT [15]. Overall drug resistance incidence (patients who came drug resistant) was 12.5% (5/40 cases).…”
Section: Dst Interpretationsmentioning
confidence: 99%