Efficacy of the FIFA 11+ Injury Prevention Program in the Collegiate Male Soccer Player

Abstract

Background The Fédération Internationale de Football Association (FIFA) 11+ program has been shown to be an effective injury prevention program in the female soccer cohort, but there is a paucity of research to demonstrate its efficacy in the male population. Hypothesis To examine the efficacy of the FIFA 11+ program in men's collegiate United States National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) Division I and Division II soccer. Study Design Randomized controlled trial; Level of evidence, 1. Methods Before the commencement of the fall 2012 season, every NCAA Division I and Division II men's collegiate soccer team (N = 396) was solicited to participate in this research study. Human ethics review board approval was obtained through Quorum Review IRB. Sixty-five teams were randomized: 34 to the control group (CG; 850 players) and 31 to the intervention group (IG; 675 players). Four teams in the IG did not complete the study, reducing the number for analysis to 61. The FIFA 11+ injury prevention program served as the intervention and was utilized weekly. Athlete-exposures (AEs), compliance, and injury data were recorded using a secure Internet-based system. Results In the CG, 665 injuries (mean ± SD, 19.56 ± 11.01) were reported for 34 teams, which corresponded to an incidence rate (IR) of 15.04 injuries per 1000 AEs. In the IG, 285 injuries (mean ± SD, 10.56 ± 3.64) were reported for 27 teams, which corresponded to an IR of 8.09 injuries per 1000 AEs. Total days missed because of injury were significantly higher for the CG (mean ± SD, 13.20 ± 26.6 days) than for the IG (mean ± SD, 10.08 ± 14.68 days) (P = .007). There was no difference for time loss due to injury based on field type (P = .341). Conclusion The FIFA 11+ significantly reduced injury rates by 46.1% and decreased time loss to injury by 28.6% in the competitive male collegiate soccer player (rate ratio, 0.54 [95% CI, 0.49-0.59]; P < .0001) (number needed to treat = 2.64).

ACL injuries in men's professional football: a 15-year prospective study on time trends and return-to-play rates reveals only 65% of players still play at the top level 3 years after ACL rupture

“…Although most research to date has been conducted in female players,18 19 there is recent evidence that ACL injury rates can also be reduced in male players 20. Highly skilled professional male senior football players have, however, not been studied and it is possible that the underlying risk factors, injury mechanisms and preventive strategies could be different in this subgroup.…”

An injury prevention pyramid for elite sports teams

“…There is good evidence that some structured injury prevention programmes can decrease the time loss to ‘preventable injuries’ by around 30% 7. If you have built a solid base to your injury prevention pyramid, these results may be slightly exaggerated however, as many of the components included in them will have already been covered in your athletic development and movement efficiency programs.…”

Epidemiology of Knee Sprains in Youth, High School, and Collegiate American Football Players

“…The proportion of knee sprains resulting from noncontact mechanisms was lowest in collegiate football (16.3%) compared with other competition levels. As a result, injury-prevention programs that reduce the risk of noncontact injury [36][37][38] may be most valuable at lower competition levels.…”