2015
DOI: 10.1037/ser0000032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficacy of structured approach therapy in reducing PTSD in returning veterans: A randomized clinical trial.

Abstract: The U.S. military deployed in support to Operation Iraqi Freedom (OIF) and Operation Enduring Freedom (OEF) show high rates of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and relationship, partner, and parenting distress. Given the pervasive effect of combat-related PTSD on returning veterans and its effect on their loved ones, the investigators have developed a couples-based treatment, structured approach therapy (SAT), to reduce PTSD while simultaneously decreasing relationship and partner distress. This study pres… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
100
1
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(105 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
(92 reference statements)
3
100
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The symptom-specific cross-lagged associations with dyadic conflict communication found in the current study suggest that a dyadic approach to recovery following traumatization among couples deemed at high risk, either by virtue of high levels of avoidance symptoms on the part of the trauma survivor and/or high levels of dysfunctional dyadic conflict communication, could be particularly helpful during the early months of recovery from trauma. For example, several existing couple-based interventions for PTSD (e.g., cognitive-behavioral conjoint therapy for PTSD [Monson & Fredman, 2012]; strategic approach therapy [Sautter, Glynn, Cretu, Senturk, & Vaught, 2015; Sautter, Glynn, Thompson, Franklin, & Han, 2009]) seek to simultaneously improve PTSD symptoms and enhance intimate relationship functioning by improving conflict management skills, decreasing effortful avoidance, and enriching emotional expression and dyadic communication and have demonstrated effects on both individual symptom clusters and relationship adjustment (Macdonald, Pukay-Martin, Wagner, Fredman, & Monson, 2016; Monson et al, 2012; Sautter et al, 2009, 2015). Future research that explores the extent to which these treatments may be adapted and delivered, perhaps in abbreviated form, to couples deemed at high risk early in the trauma recovery period could determine the safety and feasibility of conducting dyadic early interventions for trauma survivors and their loved ones.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The symptom-specific cross-lagged associations with dyadic conflict communication found in the current study suggest that a dyadic approach to recovery following traumatization among couples deemed at high risk, either by virtue of high levels of avoidance symptoms on the part of the trauma survivor and/or high levels of dysfunctional dyadic conflict communication, could be particularly helpful during the early months of recovery from trauma. For example, several existing couple-based interventions for PTSD (e.g., cognitive-behavioral conjoint therapy for PTSD [Monson & Fredman, 2012]; strategic approach therapy [Sautter, Glynn, Cretu, Senturk, & Vaught, 2015; Sautter, Glynn, Thompson, Franklin, & Han, 2009]) seek to simultaneously improve PTSD symptoms and enhance intimate relationship functioning by improving conflict management skills, decreasing effortful avoidance, and enriching emotional expression and dyadic communication and have demonstrated effects on both individual symptom clusters and relationship adjustment (Macdonald, Pukay-Martin, Wagner, Fredman, & Monson, 2016; Monson et al, 2012; Sautter et al, 2009, 2015). Future research that explores the extent to which these treatments may be adapted and delivered, perhaps in abbreviated form, to couples deemed at high risk early in the trauma recovery period could determine the safety and feasibility of conducting dyadic early interventions for trauma survivors and their loved ones.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Couples tend to be most receptive to interventions during this phase of the family life cycle, as it represents the chance for a fresh start and the opportunity to “do right by their kids” (Feinberg, 2002). Such interventions could integrate components of empirically supported transition to parenthood programs focused on strengthening the couple’s relationship and co-parenting alliance (e.g., Doss et al, 2014; Feinberg et al, 2016; Halford, Petch, & Creedy, 2010) with components of empirically supported couple-based treatments for PTSD (Monson et al, 2012; Sautter, Glynn, Cretu, Senturk, & Vaught, 2015). This type of program could also be an important way to involve fathers, as most transition to parenthood programs for parents considered to be high risk by virtue of individual psychopathology (e.g., depression) are focused on mothers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Seven unique couple‐based interventions were identified across the 16 studies for the treatment of PTSD symptoms and improvement of relationship outcomes. The seven interventions included Cognitive‐Behavioral Conjoint Therapy for PTSD (CBCT; n = 8, 47%; Monson, Guthrie, & Stevens, ), Mindfulness‐Based Cognitive‐Behavioral Conjoint Therapy for PTSD (MB‐CBCT, n = 1, 6%; Luedtke, Davis, & Monson, ), Couple Treatment for Alcohol Use Disorder (AUD) and PTSD (CTAP; n = 1, 6%; Schumm, Monson, O'Farrell, Gustin, & Chard, ), Structured Approach Therapy (SAT; n = 2, 13%; Sautter, Glynn, Cretu, Senturk, & Vaught, ), Strategic Approach Therapy (STRAT; n = 1, 6%; Sautter, Glynn, Thompson, Franklin, & Han, ), Emotionally Focused Couples Therapy (EFCT, n = 1, 6%; Johnson, ), and the Veteran Couples Integrative Intensive Retreat (VCIIR; n = 2, 13%; Monk, Ogolsky, & Bruner, ). Of the 16 articles reviewed, 11 (69%) were multisubject studies with quantitative data and five (31%) were case studies with quantitative data.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two studies have been published utilizing SAT for PTSD, including one nonrandomized multisubject study (Sautter et al, ), and one RCT (Sautter et al, ). In both studies, self‐rated PTSD symptoms were assessed using the Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Checklist‐Military Version (PCL‐M; Weathers et al, ), and clinician‐rated PTSD symptoms were assessed using the CAPS (Blake et al, ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%