The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 9:30 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 1 hour.
2018
DOI: 10.1111/psyp.13266
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficacy of stimulus intensity increases and decreases as inhibitors of the acoustic startle response

Abstract: The human startle eyeblink response can be inhibited by a change in the stimulus environment briefly before the startling stimulus; both stimulus presentation (prepulse) and cessation of background sound (gap) can result in startle inhibition. More intense prepulses often result in greater inhibition, and this study (N = 53 college students) examined whether graded decreases in sound energy relative to a steady background noise (a "partial gap") would follow this same pattern of inhibition. Embedded in a 65 dB… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
(41 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All in all, there is still no scientific consensus around the ability of the GPIAS technique in detecting tinnitus (Eggermont, 2013; Galazyuk & Hébert, 2015). However, there is considerable research conducted to improve it in both animals and humans (Blumenthal & Peterson, 2017; Longenecker et al., 2018; Peterson, 2018; Peterson & Blumenthal, 2018; Schilling et al., 2017; Wilson et al., 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All in all, there is still no scientific consensus around the ability of the GPIAS technique in detecting tinnitus (Eggermont, 2013; Galazyuk & Hébert, 2015). However, there is considerable research conducted to improve it in both animals and humans (Blumenthal & Peterson, 2017; Longenecker et al., 2018; Peterson, 2018; Peterson & Blumenthal, 2018; Schilling et al., 2017; Wilson et al., 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…He claims that lesions to nearly any brain region (or even complete decerebration) causes the organism to startle just as easily as if their brain were fully intact. Yet, other lines of research claim that the intensity of the human startle response can be influenced by factors that lie outside of the brainstem such as emotion (Blumenthal, 2000;Larrauri et al, 2011;Peterson & Blumenthal, 2018). These findings do not need to be at odds.…”
Section: The Figure In the Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dieser Zusam-menhang wurde ebenfalls in der vorliegenden Arbeit beobachtet mit Schwellenwerten von +2.7 dB für Aufwärtssprünge und -5.9 dB für Abwärtssprünge bei einer Hintergrundfrequenz von 8 kHz. Auch in Untersuchungen an Vögeln (Hienz et al, 1980) und Menschen (Sinnott et al, 1985;Peterson und Blumenthal, 2018) wurde dieses Verhältnis beschrieben. Die Intensitätsdiskriminierung von Menschen lag bei Schwellen von 1.0 -1.8 dB (Sinnott et al, 1985), während jene von Ratten im Bereich von 1.2 -6.5 dB, abhängig von der Richtung und Hintergrundfrequenz der getesteten Stimuli, zu finden waren (Hack, 1971;Syka et al, 1996).…”
Section: Intensitätsdiskriminierungunclassified