2013
DOI: 10.3892/ol.2013.1408
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficacy of sorafenib in patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumors in the third- or fourth-line treatment: A retrospective multicenter experience

Abstract: Sorafenib is a multi-targeted tyrosine kinase receptor inhibitor used to treat patients with advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs). The present study evaluated the efficacy and tolerability of sorafenib therapy for patients with GISTs. Between January 2001 and November 2012, 25 patients, from multiple centers, who had received sorafenib as the third- or fourth-line treatment for GISTs were investigated retrospectively. In total, 17 patients were male and eight were female. The median age was 54.0 ye… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In in vitro studies Heinrich et al determined that sorafenib inhibited imatinib-resistant mutations in exons encoding the ATP/drug-binding pocket (exon 11 + 13 and exon 11 + 14) and in exons encoding the activation loop (exon 17 and 18), with the exception of substitutions at KIT codon D816 and PDGFRA codon 842 [ 18 ]. Until now it has been studied in two small phase II trials and two retrospective series (smaller one center and larger multicenter with short follow-up) [ 10 12 , 20 , 21 ]. Two single-arm phase II clinical trials ( n = 38 and n = 31 patients) have demonstrated activity in patients with GIST after progression to at least imatinib and sunitinib, with an clinical benefit rate exceeding 60% and disease control rate at 24 weeks > 30%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In in vitro studies Heinrich et al determined that sorafenib inhibited imatinib-resistant mutations in exons encoding the ATP/drug-binding pocket (exon 11 + 13 and exon 11 + 14) and in exons encoding the activation loop (exon 17 and 18), with the exception of substitutions at KIT codon D816 and PDGFRA codon 842 [ 18 ]. Until now it has been studied in two small phase II trials and two retrospective series (smaller one center and larger multicenter with short follow-up) [ 10 12 , 20 , 21 ]. Two single-arm phase II clinical trials ( n = 38 and n = 31 patients) have demonstrated activity in patients with GIST after progression to at least imatinib and sunitinib, with an clinical benefit rate exceeding 60% and disease control rate at 24 weeks > 30%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A retrospective analysis of sorafenib as 3 rd or 4 th line treatment in 124 patients with advanced GIST showed median PFS of 6.4 months and median OS identical to our study – 13.5 months [ 20 ]. Another multicenter study on 25 patients showed median PFS 7.2 months and median OS 15.2 months as the 3 rd - or 4 th -line treatment for GISTs [ 21 ]. Toxicity of sorafenib in our study was mostly manageable and comparable to those observed in other multikinase inhibitors [ 5 , 6 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most common treatmentrelated adverse events (≥ grade 3) were hypertension (23%), hand-foot skin reaction (20%), and diarrhea (5%). Sorafenib, [30][31][32][33] nilotinib, [34][35][36][37][38] dasatinib, 39,40 and pazopanib 41 have also shown activity in patients with GIST resistant to imatinib and sunitinib. Much of the data on these TKIs are from phase II studies and retrospective analyses involving small numbers of patients.…”
Section: Management Of Resistance To Imatinib and Sunitinibmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…45 Regorafenib (category 1) is recommended for patients experiencing disease progression on imatinib and sunitinib. 29 Based on the limited data, [30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40] the NCCN Guidelines have also included sorafenib, dasatinib, and nilotinib as additional options for patients who are no longer receiving clinical benefit from imatinib, sunitinib, or regorafenib (see SARC-E, page 858), although all data regarding the potential benefit of these agents are from the preregorafenib era.…”
Section: Nccn Recommendationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, sorafenib also showed certain efficacy toward GIST. Yet its efficacy was lower than that of imatinib, and was thus only used as third/fourth line, after failure of initial therapy [97].…”
Section: Gistmentioning
confidence: 99%