2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2011.08.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficacy of sodium hypochlorite, ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid, citric acid and phosphoric acid in calcium hydroxide removal from the root canal: a microscopic cleanliness evaluation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
14
0
3

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
2
14
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The use of the rotary instrument associated with the EndoVac, EndoActivator, and PUI improved the removal of Ca(OH) 2 resulting in cleaner root canals. Nevertheless, none of the techniques completely removed the Ca(OH) 2 from the root canal, and this is in agreement with previous studies that found residues of this medication in the root canal, irrespective of the use of different irrigation/agitation systems of irrigants and devices, such as laser, for example (Van der Sluis et al, 2007;Kuga et al, 2010;Silva et al, 2011;Tasdemir et al, 2011;Wiseman et al, 2011;Kaptan et al, 2012;Goode et al, 2013). Thus, future researches must be conducted, using other techniques for Ca(OH) 2 removal from the root canal.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The use of the rotary instrument associated with the EndoVac, EndoActivator, and PUI improved the removal of Ca(OH) 2 resulting in cleaner root canals. Nevertheless, none of the techniques completely removed the Ca(OH) 2 from the root canal, and this is in agreement with previous studies that found residues of this medication in the root canal, irrespective of the use of different irrigation/agitation systems of irrigants and devices, such as laser, for example (Van der Sluis et al, 2007;Kuga et al, 2010;Silva et al, 2011;Tasdemir et al, 2011;Wiseman et al, 2011;Kaptan et al, 2012;Goode et al, 2013). Thus, future researches must be conducted, using other techniques for Ca(OH) 2 removal from the root canal.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…1), and 115 studies were off topic. Reasons for exclusion were the following: studies assessing irrigating solutions (14,(16)(17)(18)(19)(44)(45)(46)(47)(48)(49)(50)(51)(52)(53), no apical third evaluation (21,31,(54)(55)(56)(57)(58)(59), no ultrasonically activated irrigation (10-12, 20, 25, 28-30, 60-74), no extracted human adult teeth (75)(76)(77), evaluated under the scanning electron microscopy (39)(40)(41), and case reports (13). Full texts of 62 potential studies were assessed.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[17] This is in agreement with previous studies. [1819] The crudest of the irrigation techniques–conventional syringe irrigation–remains the most commonly practiced method of irrigation due to its simplicity, easy control of needle penetration depth, and irrigant volume flushed through the canal. The results of this study reiterate the need for more sophisticated methods of irrigation such as ultrasonic irrigation systems.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%