2021
DOI: 10.1080/10937404.2021.1943087
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficacy of soap and water based skin decontamination usingin vivoanimal models: a systematic review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The in vitro and in vivo studies reviewed above showed there are merits to data collection on the wash-in effect using either method, be it the cost-effective nature and specificity of mechanism afforded by in vitro studies, or the biological interactions present in in vivo studies. Both, however, have their drawbacks, including the possibility of an in vitro artifact influencing the wash-in effect, and no in vivo test being fully representative of human pharmacokinetics or physiology (Bronaugh and Maibach 2005 ; Burli et al 2021 ). To better understand the real-world relevance of the wash-in effect for mass decontamination, the goal needs to be to identify the wash-in effect using simulants in human volunteers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The in vitro and in vivo studies reviewed above showed there are merits to data collection on the wash-in effect using either method, be it the cost-effective nature and specificity of mechanism afforded by in vitro studies, or the biological interactions present in in vivo studies. Both, however, have their drawbacks, including the possibility of an in vitro artifact influencing the wash-in effect, and no in vivo test being fully representative of human pharmacokinetics or physiology (Bronaugh and Maibach 2005 ; Burli et al 2021 ). To better understand the real-world relevance of the wash-in effect for mass decontamination, the goal needs to be to identify the wash-in effect using simulants in human volunteers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is a concern for first responders, as an increase in the dermal penetration of hazardous chemicals may elevate the risk or severity of harm. While previous literature reviews identified both in vivo (Burli et al 2021 ) and in vitro (Chiang et al 2021a ) decontamination studies that displayed wash-in effects, no apparent reviews have specifically investigated the wash-in effect since 2006. This literature review (1) assesses the current published information available to better understand this phenomenon, (2) describes the proposed mechanisms, and (3) explores whether the wash-in effect has implications for decontamination interventions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This was later established and coined as the “wash‐in” effect, a phenomenon in which the process of skin washing paradoxically enhances skin penetration and systemic uptake, as summarized in a review by Moody and Maibach (2006). Additionally, prior reviews pending publication and conducted by Kashetsky et al (2021) and Burli et al (2021) examined the efficacy of decontamination using water‐only or water and soap solutions in in vivo human and animal models, respectively, and concluded that such methods resulted in incomplete removal of contaminants in the majority of cases. Additionally, firm conclusions regarding the efficacy of soap and water decontamination could not be drawn due to lacking absorption and excretion quantification.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, based on previous in vivo studies, the ‘wash‐in’ effect may be associated to a higher probability for a more rapid onset of cholinergic signs rather than considering the decontamination as ineffective (Bjarnason et al, 2008; Misik et al, 2012). The general efficacy of soap and water based skin decontamination has recently been reviewed (Burli et al, 2021; Chiang et al, 2021; Kashetsky et al, 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%