2005
DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2005.01559.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficacy of small group reading intervention for beginning readers with reading‐delay: a randomised controlled trial

Abstract: A reading intervention programme delivered on a daily basis by trained teaching assistants is an effective intervention for children who show reading delays at the end of their first year in school. However, around one-quarter of the children did not respond to this intervention and these children would appear to need more intensive or more prolonged help to improve their reading skills.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

5
136
2
6

Year Published

2007
2007
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 139 publications
(149 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
5
136
2
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Further rigorous evidence for the effectiveness of Reading Intervention comes from a randomised control trial (RCT) conducted by Hatcher et al (2006b). In this study, Reading Intervention was delivered to children aged 5-6 years, who represented the bottom 8% of the population in terms of reading development.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further rigorous evidence for the effectiveness of Reading Intervention comes from a randomised control trial (RCT) conducted by Hatcher et al (2006b). In this study, Reading Intervention was delivered to children aged 5-6 years, who represented the bottom 8% of the population in terms of reading development.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Stripped of its polemics, the critique argues that the design is flawed; that the statistics used are inappropriate; and that their own work (Hatcher et al, 2006) provides a paradigm case of how to design intervention studies.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A fonológiai tudatosság és az olvasni tanulás között háromféle kapcsolatot határoznak meg (Wagner, Torgesen, & Rashotte, 1994;Lukatela, Carello, Shankweiler, & Liberman, 1995;Troia, 1999;Elbro & Pallesen, 2002;Castles & Coltheart, 2004;Muter, Hulme, Snowling, & Stevenson, 2004;Hatcher et al, 2006): (1) a fonológiai tudatosság fejlettsége befolyásolja az olvasást (Wagner, Torgesen, & Rashotte, 1994;Hatcher et al, 2006); (2) a gyermek fonológiai tudatossága az olvasás során fejlődik (Morais, 1991); (3) a fonoló-giai tudatosság fejlődése és az olvasástanulás a kezdeti időszakban kétirányú; a korai fonológiai tudatosság fejlesztése ösztönzőleg hat a korai szófelismerés fejlődésére, ami elő-segíti a bonyolultabb, magasabb fokú fonológiai ismeretek fejlődését (Perfetti, Beck, Ball, & Hughes, 1987;Cataldo & Ellis, 1988;Castles & Coltheart, 2004).…”
unclassified