2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2015.11.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficacy of single and multi-metric fish-based indices in tracking anthropogenic pressures in estuaries: An 8-year case study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several multi‐metric approaches that combine a variety of fish community measures or metrics into an overall index have been developed, and this multi‐metric approach has been widely applied in a variety of countries (Souza & Vianna, 2020). In addition, Martinho et al., (2015) assessed several univariate measures (species number, Shannon–Wiener H’, Pielou J’) and a multi‐metric fish index (Estuarine Fish Assessment Index, EFAI) in relation to anthropogenic pressure and found that single indices were highly variable and did not exhibit any relationship with anthropogenic pressure while a significant relationship was observed between the multi‐metric index and anthropogenic pressure. This highlighted the value of multi‐metric indices in ecological quality assessment, when compared with univariate measures.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several multi‐metric approaches that combine a variety of fish community measures or metrics into an overall index have been developed, and this multi‐metric approach has been widely applied in a variety of countries (Souza & Vianna, 2020). In addition, Martinho et al., (2015) assessed several univariate measures (species number, Shannon–Wiener H’, Pielou J’) and a multi‐metric fish index (Estuarine Fish Assessment Index, EFAI) in relation to anthropogenic pressure and found that single indices were highly variable and did not exhibit any relationship with anthropogenic pressure while a significant relationship was observed between the multi‐metric index and anthropogenic pressure. This highlighted the value of multi‐metric indices in ecological quality assessment, when compared with univariate measures.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies indicated low to moderate levels of metals (Coelho et al, 2006), PCBs (Baptista et al, 2013) and dioxin like PCDD/Fs (Nunes et al, 2011) in the watersediment fraction of Mondego estuary. In the same instance, Martinho et al (2015) observed a decreasing trend in total anthropogenic pressure between 2005 and 2012, reflecting mainly a decline in agriculture occupied area, number of industries and population density in the watershed over the last decade, pointing a constant increase in ecological quality of the estuarine ecosystem, assessed by fish component.…”
Section: Study Sitementioning
confidence: 91%
“…The FCI is a multimetric biotic index, namely a composite indicator of ecological condition that integrates information from a suite of biological variables (“metrics”), each of which quantifies an aspect of the structure or function of the biotic community and responds to a range of stressors affecting the ecosystem (Martinho et al ; Hallett, Valesini, Clarke et al ). In focusing on fish communities, the FCI provides a means to assess a key biological component of the system that integrates (and thus reflects) many aspects of estuarine condition from benthic to pelagic zones and is also highly valued by society.…”
Section: Fish Community Index Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%