Abstract:The correlation of the PLT increment with other clinical outcomes and the effect of leukoreduction on HLA-matched PLT transfusion could not be determined. Prospective studies utilizing current technology and examining clinical outcomes are necessary to demonstrate the effectiveness of HLA-matched PLT transfusion.
“…In the context of this document, HLA crossmatched platelets are platelets that have had in vitro crossmatching performed vs platelets that are selected to be antigen negative for any patient HLA antibodies. There were 5 studies [24] that compared some of these methods. However, no definite inferences can be made as to the superiority of one method compared to the others.…”
Section: Summary Evidence and Rationale For Recommendationsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The effect of HLA selection appeared less evident in studies that used leukoreduced products compared to studies involving nonleukoreduced platelets (Appendix A, Supplementary Tables S15 and S16). There was no benefit of using HLA selection to reduce alloimmunization rates and refractoriness beyond the use of leukoreduced platelets in nonrefractory patients [24].…”
Section: Summary Evidence and Rationale For Recommendationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One RCT and 29 nonrandomized studies of 1600 patients comprised the systematic review [24]. Most studies did not include technologies currently in use for HLA typing or detection of HLA class I antibodies implicated, as 75% were conducted before the year 2000.…”
Section: Summary Evidence and Rationale For Recommendationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Three published systematic reviews were included [21][22][23], and 5 systematic reviews were conducted by the ICTMG. Two [24,25] of the 5 conducted systematic reviews are published as full articles. Two [21,23] of the 8 systematic reviews included mainly randomized controlled trials, whereas 4 had mostly nonrandomized studies, for example, ABO matching, HLA matching, and crossmatching for platelet transfusions [22,24,25] and use of Rh immunoglobulin.…”
“…In the context of this document, HLA crossmatched platelets are platelets that have had in vitro crossmatching performed vs platelets that are selected to be antigen negative for any patient HLA antibodies. There were 5 studies [24] that compared some of these methods. However, no definite inferences can be made as to the superiority of one method compared to the others.…”
Section: Summary Evidence and Rationale For Recommendationsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The effect of HLA selection appeared less evident in studies that used leukoreduced products compared to studies involving nonleukoreduced platelets (Appendix A, Supplementary Tables S15 and S16). There was no benefit of using HLA selection to reduce alloimmunization rates and refractoriness beyond the use of leukoreduced platelets in nonrefractory patients [24].…”
Section: Summary Evidence and Rationale For Recommendationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One RCT and 29 nonrandomized studies of 1600 patients comprised the systematic review [24]. Most studies did not include technologies currently in use for HLA typing or detection of HLA class I antibodies implicated, as 75% were conducted before the year 2000.…”
Section: Summary Evidence and Rationale For Recommendationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Three published systematic reviews were included [21][22][23], and 5 systematic reviews were conducted by the ICTMG. Two [24,25] of the 5 conducted systematic reviews are published as full articles. Two [21,23] of the 8 systematic reviews included mainly randomized controlled trials, whereas 4 had mostly nonrandomized studies, for example, ABO matching, HLA matching, and crossmatching for platelet transfusions [22,24,25] and use of Rh immunoglobulin.…”
“…However, a cross‐matched PLT is more expensive and requires greater effort than a standard PLT for physical cross‐match. A recent report attests to the utility of virtual HLA cross‐matched PLT (HLA‐matched PLT) that is defined as HLA‐A/B matched or excludes cross‐reactive groups …”
BACKGROUND
Cross‐matched platelet (cross‐matched PLT) transfusion is effective for immune‐mediated platelet transfusion refractoriness (PTR), but is more costly and time‐consuming for physical cross‐match than using standard PLT units. Recent studies have reported the utility of human leucocyte antigens (HLA) virtual cross‐matched PLT (HLA‐matched PLT) that is defined as HLA‐A/B matched or no antibody against donor‐specific antigen. Here, we evaluated the effect of HLA‐matched PLTs for PTR in post hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) recipients.
STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS
Our study included a total of 241 PLTs in 16 patients who underwent HSCT at Okayama University Hospital between 2010 and 2017, receiving either HLA‐matched or cross‐matched PLTs. We calculated the 24‐hour corrected count increments (CCI‐24) to evaluate the effect of PLTs. A CCI‐24 ≥ 4500 was considered to be a successful transfusion.
RESULTS
We analyzed 139 cross‐matched PLTs and 102 HLA‐matched PLTs. In the immune‐mediated PTR, the rate of successful transfusion was 60.5% for cross‐matched PLT and 63.4% for HLA‐matched PLT (p = 0.825). On the other hand, the median CCI‐24 for cross‐matched PLT transfusions and HLA‐matched PLT transfusions were 1856 and 5824 (p < 0.001), with a success rate of 28.1 and 54.1% in cases with non‐immune‐mediated PTR, respectively (p = 0.001).
CONCLUSION
The effectiveness of HLA‐matched PLT is not inferior to cross‐matched PLT. This result indicates that physical cross‐match can be omitted in post HSCT PTR.
We found low- to moderate-grade evidence that a therapeutic-only platelet transfusion policy is associated with increased risk of bleeding when compared with a prophylactic platelet transfusion policy in haematology patients who are thrombocytopenic due to myelosuppressive chemotherapy or HSCT. There is insufficient evidence to determine any difference in mortality rates and no evidence of any difference in adverse events between a therapeutic-only platelet transfusion policy and a prophylactic platelet transfusion policy. A therapeutic-only platelet transfusion policy is associated with a clear reduction in the number of platelet components administered.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.