Efficacy of Rhodopseudomonas containing multi-microbe probiotic on growth performance, mortality and cecal microflora in broilers

Bostami, A. B. M. Rubayet; Ahmed, Sonia Tabasum; Mun, Hong-Seok; Hong, Seong-Gil; Yang, Chul-Ju

doi:10.5897/ajmr2016.8114

Cited by 7 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 35 publications

(45 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Studies have been conducted to improve the PUFA content in chicken through dietary addition of fat and oil sources that contains PUFA or linoleic acid [9,17], as well as dietary feed additives such as probiotics, prebiotics and natural plant materials [18][19][20][21][22]. However, PUFA tends to be oxidized as it is the first target for the free radical strike upon initiation of lipid peroxidation [23].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Breast and Thigh Meat Chemical Composition and Fatty Acid Profile in Broilers Fed Diet with Dietary Fat Sources

Bostami¹,

Mun²,

Yang³

2017

J Food Process Technol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Experiment was conducted to evaluate effects of different fat sources on breast and thigh meat chemical composition and fatty acid profile in broilers. Treatments were 1) DF1: basal diet + soybean oil; 2) DF2: basal diet + chicken fat; 3) DF2: basal diet + tallow; 4) DF3: basal diet + tallow and lard, and 5) DF5: basal diet + lard. Addition of different fat sources had no significant impact on relative organ weight (P>0.05). Breast meat crude fat content was suppressed in DF1 and DF5 relative to DF4 (P<0.05). Total SFA content was downtrended and total PUFA content was elevated in DF1 relative to other groups for both breast and thigh meat (P<0.05). Total MUFA content did not differ in breast meat, however, it was lower in DF1 and DF3 compared to DF2, DF4 and DF5 (P<0.05). The n-3 PUFA was not affected by fat sources in breast meat, whereas it was elevated in DF1 relative to DF3, DF4 and DF5 in thigh meat (P<0.05). Breast and thigh meat n-6 PUFA was improved in DF1 in comparison to DF2, DF3, DF4 and DF5 in thigh meat (P<0.05). Ratio of PUFA to SFA upgraded in DF1 and DF3, and downgraded in DF2, DF4 and DF5 for breast meat; and upgraded in DF1 than other groups for thigh meat (P<0.05). Breast and thigh meat n-6 to n-3 PUFA was upgraded in DF1 group compared to other groups (P<0.05). To sum up, results indicated that dietary fat sources with different fatty acid content can significantly influence the breast and thigh meat composition and fatty acid profile without negative impact on the relative organ weight. Where DF1 group exhibited better result based on fatty acid profile and lower breast meat fat content which can be preferred for quality broiler meat production.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Breast and Thigh Meat Chemical Composition and Fatty Acid Profile in Broilers Fed Diet with Dietary Fat Sources

Bostami¹,

Mun²,

Yang³

2017

J Food Process Technol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…(2016), 335 mg chlortetracycline/kg feed; Bostami et al. (2016), 1,000 mg chlortetracycline hydrochloride/kg feed, corresponding to 930 mg chlortetracycline/kg feed). Moreover, two studies out of 17 presented some limitations: in the study of Alvares et al.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In the study of Bostami et al. (2016), a total of 300 1‐day‐old mixed‐sex Ross (exact strain not specified) chickens for fattening were allocated to three dietary treatments and distributed in ten pens per treatment, in groups of ten chickens per pen. Two basal diets based on maize and soybean meal (starter and finisher) were either not supplemented (control) or supplemented with different treatments.…”

Section: Assessmentmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In 17 studies in chickens for fattening, dietary chlortetracycline supplementation at concentrations ranging from 10 to 930 mg/kg feed improved growth performance of chickens for fattening ( € Ur € us ßan and B € ol € ukbas ßı (2017), 10 mg chlortetracycline/kg feed; Chen et al (2018), 40 mg chlortetracycline/kg feed; Qu et al (2018), Hong et al (2019), Li et al (2019aLi et al ( , 2020, 50 mg chlortetracycline/kg feed; Begin (1971), 50, 100 and 200 mg chlortetracycline/kg feed; Stutz and Lawton (1984), 55 mg chlortetracycline/kg feed; Han et al (2012), Hosseini and Meimandipour (2018) and Li et al (2007), 80 mg chlortetracycline/kg feed from day 1 to day 21 of age and then 50 mg chlortetracycline/kg feed from day 22 to day 42 of age; Alvares et al (1964), 100 mg chlortetracycline/kg feed; Dong et al (2011), Aguirre et al (2015) and Liao et al (2015), 150 mg chlortetracycline/kg feed; Bagal et al (2016), 335 mg chlortetracycline/kg feed; Bostami et al (2016), 1,000 mg chlortetracycline hydrochloride/kg feed, corresponding to 930 mg chlortetracycline/kg feed). Moreover, two studies out of 17 presented some limitations: in the study of Alvares et al (1964), the positive effect of dietary chlortetracycline supplementation was observed in feed containing sucrose but not in feed containing starch or dextrose; in the study of Liao et al (2015), the positive effect of dietary chlortetracycline supplementation was observed only on weight gain from 22 to 42 days of age.…”

Section: Poultrymentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Maximum levels of cross‐contamination for 24 antimicrobial active substances in non‐target feed. Part 12: Tetracyclines: tetracycline, chlortetracycline, oxytetracycline, and doxycycline

Koutsoumanis¹,

Allende²,

Álvarez‐Ordóñez³

et al. 2021

EFS2

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The specific concentrations of tetracycline, chlortetracycline, oxytetracycline and doxycycline in nontarget feed for food-producing animals, below which there would not be an effect on the emergence of, and/or selection for, resistance in bacteria relevant for human and animal health, as well as the specific antimicrobial concentrations in feed which have an effect in terms of growth promotion/increased yield were assessed by EFSA in collaboration with EMA. Details of the methodology used for this assessment, associated data gaps and uncertainties are presented in a separate document. To address antimicrobial resistance, the Feed Antimicrobial Resistance Selection Concentration (FARSC) model developed specifically for the assessment was applied. The FARSC for these four tetracyclines was estimated. To address growth promotion, data from scientific publications obtained from an extensive literature review were used. Levels in feed that showed to have an effect on growth promotion/increased yield were reported for tetracycline, chlortetracycline, oxytetracycline, whilst for doxycycline no suitable data for the assessment were available. Uncertainties and data gaps associated with the levels reported were addressed. It was recommended to perform further studies to supply more diverse and complete data related to the requirements for calculation of the FARSC for these antimicrobials.

show abstract

Novel mono‐ and multi‐strain probiotics supplementation modulates growth, intestinal microflora composition and haemato‐biochemical parameters in broiler chickens

Reuben

Sarkar²,

Ibnat³

et al. 2022

Veterinary Medicine & Sci

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background The reduction of antimicrobial usage in food‐producing animals necessitates the intense search for novel alternatives, including new probiotic strains with more effective properties in improving growth performance and curtailing diseases in animals. Objective This study evaluated the effects of novel mono‐ and multi‐strain probiotics on the growth performance, intestinal microbiota and haemato‐biochemical parameters of broilers. Methods A total of 160 one‐day‐old Cobb 500 broilers were divided into eight treatment groups with two replicates consisting of (1) basal diet (negative control), (2) basal diet with antibiotic, colistin sulphate, (3) basal diet with commercial probiotic, PROMAX® (positive control), (4) basal diet with Pediococcus acidilactici I5, (5) basal diet with P. pentosaceus I13, (6) basal diet with Enterococcus faecium C14, (7) basal diet with Lactobacillus plantarum C16 and (8) basal diet with the combination of all the four probiotic strains. Birds were kept for 35 days and through oral gavage, 1 ml of 108 study probiotic strains administered on days 3–6, 14 and 18. Results Supplementation with P. pentosaceus I13, L. plantarum C16 or multi‐strain probiotics significantly (p < 0.05) improved the body weight gain and feed conversion ratio with decrease in feed intake and intestinal Enterobacteria counts. There was a significant (p < 0.05) increase in haemoglobin, mean corpuscular volume, total white blood cells, platelets counts and a lowered (p < 0.05) total cholesterol and glucose levels in multi‐strains probiotic supplemented birds. Conclusion The supplementation with novel multi‐strain probiotics improved growth, intestinal health and haemato‐biochemical parameters in broilers and could be used as suitable antibiotic alternatives.

show abstract

Efficacy of Rhodopseudomonas containing multi-microbe probiotic on growth performance, mortality and cecal microflora in broilers

Cited by 7 publications

References 35 publications

Breast and Thigh Meat Chemical Composition and Fatty Acid Profile in Broilers Fed Diet with Dietary Fat Sources

Breast and Thigh Meat Chemical Composition and Fatty Acid Profile in Broilers Fed Diet with Dietary Fat Sources

Maximum levels of cross‐contamination for 24 antimicrobial active substances in non‐target feed. Part 12: Tetracyclines: tetracycline, chlortetracycline, oxytetracycline, and doxycycline

Novel mono‐ and multi‐strain probiotics supplementation modulates growth, intestinal microflora composition and haemato‐biochemical parameters in broiler chickens

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About