Efficacy of population‐wide diabetes and obesity prevention programs: An overview of systematic reviews on proximal, intermediate, and distal outcomes and a meta‐analysis of impact on BMI

Abstract

We conducted an overview of systematic reviews and a meta-analysis of the impact on body mass index (BMI) of primary studies of population-wide obesity and diabetes prevention programs, in order to evaluate their efficacy. We searched eight databases for reviews of population-level programs reporting effect on diet, physical activity, BMI, or prevalence of obesity/overweight or type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).Meta-analysis of primary studies within reviews reporting effect on BMI. Interventions were categorized using ANGELO framework and quality assessment using AMSTAR. Fifty-three systematic reviews were included. Primary studies were largely natural experiments or cross-sectional studies of national data. Increased price of sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs) and fast food, decreased price of fruit and vegetables, food labelling, and grocery store interventions were associated with positive effects on diet. Park and playground renovations and point-of-choice prompts to increase stair use were associated with positive effects on physical activity. Increased price of SSBs, menu labelling, grocery store interventions, and multicomponent interventions were associated with small reductions in BMI. There was insufficient evidence of impact of any interventions on the prevalence of overweight, obesity, or T2DM. We have identified a promising suite of population-wide actions to improve diet, increase physical activity, and reduce BMI. Impact on subsequent incidence of T2DM remains speculative.

A bit or a lot on the side? Observational study of the energy content of starters, sides and desserts in major UK restaurant chains

“…It showed that there was a reduction in kcals ordered by consumers and a reduction in energy content of menu items provided by restaurants when the energy content of meals was displayed at the point of choice 23. Thus, this research supports the proposition that menu labelling may benefit public health through two main channels: industry reformulation and individual behaviour change 24. Given that kcal labelling is only likely to have a small effect on daily energy intake, a combination of this and other population-wide interventions will be required to improve diet and reduce obesity.…”

Diabetes Mellitus and Associated Factors in Slovakia: Results from the European Health Interview Survey 2009, 2014, and 2019

“…A systematic review, for example, about regulatory interventions targeting population nutrition found that some “isolated regulatory interventions” may have a positive impact on intermediate outcomes, but this change has not reached clinically significant levels—e.g., having such an impact on food intake that can result in reduced incidence of obesity or NCDs [ 37 ]. Similarly, another systematic review has not found evidence of the impact of any of the studied interventions on the prevalence of overweight, obesity, or T2DM [ 38 ]. Simulation studies project that a network of interventions is needed to achieve the targets in disease burden reduction.…”

Efeito de cinco modelos de rotulagem nutricional frontal no tempo para escolhas alimentares entre brasilienses

“…Dentre estas medidas, destaca-se: a adoção de impostos para aumentar o preço dos alimentos e bebidas ultraprocessados; subsídios para reduzir o preço de alimentos in natura e minimamente processados; restrição da publicidade de alimentos; e proibição da venda de alimentos ultraprocessados em escolas. 15,17,18 Nossos achados reforçam que a RNF é uma medida relevante para facilitar a escolha de alimentos saudáveis, sobretudo diante do barateamento 19 e aumento do consumo de alimentos ultraprocessados, 20 com alto teor de nutrientes críticos, do encarecimento de alimentos in natura e minimamente processados, 21 como arroz, feijão, frutas, legumes e verduras, e do agravamento das desigualdades sociais e da fome no Brasil. 22 É limitação do estudo o fato de os participantes visualizarem apenas a imagem da parte frontal dos produtos, isto é, não havia lista de ingredientes ou informações nutricionais para comparar os produtos de cada par.…”