Purpose
Dry eye, a common, yet under-recognized and evolving field, has few recommended treatment algorithms, mostly based on expert consensus rather than robust research evidence. There are high costs associated with managing dry eye and conducting research to identify effective and safe long-term treatments. To support evidence-based management of dry eye, our purpose was to identify and prioritize important clinical research questions for future clinical research.
Methods
We translated recommendations from the American Academy of Ophthalmology’s 2013 Preferred Practice Patterns for dry eye into answerable clinical research questions about treatment effectiveness. Clinicians around the world who manage patients with dry eye rated each question’s importance from 0 (not important) to 10 (very important) using a two-round online Delphi survey. We considered questions as “important” if ≥75% of respondents assigned a rating of 6 or more in Round 2. We mapped the identified important clinical research questions to reliable systematic reviews published up to March 2016.
Results
Seventy-five clinicians from at least 21 countries completed both Delphi rounds. Among the 58 questions, 24 questions met our definition of “important”: 9/24 and 7/24 addressed topical and systemic treatments, respectively. All four questions with the highest 25th percentiles addressed topical treatments. While 6/24 “important” questions were associated with four existing reliable systematic reviews, none of these reviews came to a definitive conclusion about treatment effectiveness.
Conclusion
We identified gaps pertaining to treatment options for dry eye. Future clinical research on the management of dry eye should strongly consider these prioritized questions.