2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.bjorl.2019.12.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficacy of pillar suture for post-tonsillectomy morbidity in children: a meta-analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
(32 reference statements)
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We did prefer to control bleeding in the operating room more than bedside treatment. It is ideal for surgeons to select the surgical procedure they are most familiar with to prevent bleeding, regardless of whether electrocoagulation or suturing of the tonsil pillars is considered the common measure[ 38 , 39 ]. The incidence rate of postoperative hemorrhage is an important quality and safety indicator in tonsillectomy and should not be ignored [40].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We did prefer to control bleeding in the operating room more than bedside treatment. It is ideal for surgeons to select the surgical procedure they are most familiar with to prevent bleeding, regardless of whether electrocoagulation or suturing of the tonsil pillars is considered the common measure[ 38 , 39 ]. The incidence rate of postoperative hemorrhage is an important quality and safety indicator in tonsillectomy and should not be ignored [40].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Absorbable sutures might cause a higher wound infection rate due to the greater inflammatory response or tissue reactivity 34,35 . However, a meta‐analysis showed that suturing the pillars did not increase the rate of suture site infection 36 . The majority of the studies in this meta‐analysis preferred absorbable sutures.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…34,35 However, a metaanalysis showed that suturing the pillars did not increase the rate of suture site infection. 36 The majority of the studies in this metaanalysis preferred absorbable sutures. We divided the patients into two groups, according to the number of stitches at operation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The treatment of children's facial emergency trauma usually requires more sophisticated cosmetic suture technology because their families require better prognosis. 18 However, because children patients cannot communicate effectively between doctors and patients, their compliance is poor, and it is difficult to cooperate with cosmetic suture perioperative treatment. 19 For children who use non-absorbable nylon thread to suture, anaesthesia is generally not recommended when removing stitches.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%