2010
DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(10)60889-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficacy of pentavalent rotavirus vaccine against severe rotavirus gastroenteritis in infants in developing countries in sub-Saharan Africa: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

Abstract: PATH (GAVI Alliance grant) and Merck.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

25
461
2
9

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 638 publications
(497 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
25
461
2
9
Order By: Relevance
“…[18][19][20][21][22][23][24] In contrast, studies conducted in low-income countries in Africa and Asia revealed that the efficacy of the 2 vaccines ranged from 56% to 64% in protecting against severe rotavirus gastroenteritis. [25][26][27][28][29][30] In addition, in these settings vaccine efficacy waned between the first and second years after immunisation. [25][26][27][28][29][30] These findings are supported by a recent Cochrane systematic review which revealed that RV1 and RV5 demonstrated diminished efficacy against severe rotavirus gastroenteritis in WHO subregions classified as having "high" rates of childhood mortality and "high" or "very high" rates of adult mortality, compared with subregions with "very low" or "low" rates of child and adult mortality.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…[18][19][20][21][22][23][24] In contrast, studies conducted in low-income countries in Africa and Asia revealed that the efficacy of the 2 vaccines ranged from 56% to 64% in protecting against severe rotavirus gastroenteritis. [25][26][27][28][29][30] In addition, in these settings vaccine efficacy waned between the first and second years after immunisation. [25][26][27][28][29][30] These findings are supported by a recent Cochrane systematic review which revealed that RV1 and RV5 demonstrated diminished efficacy against severe rotavirus gastroenteritis in WHO subregions classified as having "high" rates of childhood mortality and "high" or "very high" rates of adult mortality, compared with subregions with "very low" or "low" rates of child and adult mortality.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[25][26][27][28][29][30] In addition, in these settings vaccine efficacy waned between the first and second years after immunisation. [25][26][27][28][29][30] These findings are supported by a recent Cochrane systematic review which revealed that RV1 and RV5 demonstrated diminished efficacy against severe rotavirus gastroenteritis in WHO subregions classified as having "high" rates of childhood mortality and "high" or "very high" rates of adult mortality, compared with subregions with "very low" or "low" rates of child and adult mortality. This reduced vaccine efficacy persisted after 1 to 2 y of follow-up.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Whereas clinical trials of these vaccines demonstrated high efficacy against severe rotavirus gastroenteritis in high-and middle-income countries in the Americas and Europe (85%-98%), trials in low-and middle-income countries in Africa and Asia have demonstrated lower efficacy (61%-64% and 48%, respectively) [6][7][8][9][10]. Despite lower efficacy in lowresource settings, the benefits of vaccination could be substantial in countries with a high baseline burden of severe rotavirus disease.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5 These 2 vaccines have been shown to be safe and efficacious in both developed and some developing countries. [6][7][8] However, the immunogenicity and efficacy of these vaccines are substantially reduced in low-income countries of Africa, Asia and Central America, [9][10][11] where the high mortality due to rotavirus infections occurs. 12,13 In addition, formation of reassortant rotaviruses between vaccine strains and circulating wild-type strains or among vaccine strains can potentially increase virulence as reported recently.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%