2016
DOI: 10.1093/bja/aew223
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficacy of pectoral nerve block versus thoracic paravertebral block for postoperative analgesia after radical mastectomy: a randomized controlled trial

Abstract: CTRI/2014/06/004692.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
189
1
4

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 225 publications
(202 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
(10 reference statements)
8
189
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Many refinements of the initial pectoral nerve block have recently been published without proper testing of the initial Pecs I. Some clinical data seem to prove the efficiency of Pecs blocks, [14][15][16][17] but no prospective randomized controlled trial has compared Pecs I with a placebo.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many refinements of the initial pectoral nerve block have recently been published without proper testing of the initial Pecs I. Some clinical data seem to prove the efficiency of Pecs blocks, [14][15][16][17] but no prospective randomized controlled trial has compared Pecs I with a placebo.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alternatively, targeted infusions could be performed with paraverterbal, pectoralis or serratus anterior nerve blocks. This has shown promise in reducing post-operative mastectomy pain [10,11]; however, to our knowledge, this has not been explored in women undergoing autologous reconstruction or investigated in concert with a TAP block.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These demonstrate that the Pecs blocks are associated with lower pain scores and opioid sparing effects compared to placebo [35,36]. Comparing the Pecs blocks with single thoracic paravertebral injections has produced conflicting efficacy results [37,38]. Potential complications following these blocks include pneumothorax and injury to the thoracodorsal artery.…”
Section: Evidence and Clinical Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%