2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jgo.2018.08.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficacy of panitumumab in older patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: a retrospective analysis using the database of the Hellenic Oncology Research Group (HORG)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Specifically, the safety and efficacy outcome of elderly patients fit enough to receive combination chemotherapy plus biological agents is an issue of growing interest. [16][17][18] In this subgroup analysis of the Valentino study, no significant differences for efficacy in terms of PFS, OS, clinical benefit and response rate were observed between patients aged <70 or 70 years and the effect of the maintenance treatment arm on the survival outcomes was similar in the two age subgroups. Moreover, the safety profile of both induction and maintenance treatment, as well as the impact on QoL, was similar in elderly and younger patients, with no clinically meaningful or statistically significant differences.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…Specifically, the safety and efficacy outcome of elderly patients fit enough to receive combination chemotherapy plus biological agents is an issue of growing interest. [16][17][18] In this subgroup analysis of the Valentino study, no significant differences for efficacy in terms of PFS, OS, clinical benefit and response rate were observed between patients aged <70 or 70 years and the effect of the maintenance treatment arm on the survival outcomes was similar in the two age subgroups. Moreover, the safety profile of both induction and maintenance treatment, as well as the impact on QoL, was similar in elderly and younger patients, with no clinically meaningful or statistically significant differences.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…In the subgroup analysis of RAS WT patients from the PRIME study the combination of FOLFOX-4 and panitumumab showed a benefit over FOLFOX-4 in the subset of patients aged more than 65 years (n=188), in terms of OS (26.6 versus 17.4 months; HR 0.78; 95% CI, 0.58–1.09), PFS (9.7 versus 9.2 months; HR 0.88; 95% CI, 0.65–1.19) and ORR (49% versus 42%), without raising any safety concern 63. Positive results in terms of tolerability and efficacy were also recently reported in a retrospective study of 100 patients aged over 70 years (95.4% ECOG performance status 0–1) treated with doublet chemotherapy plus panitumumab, with a median PFS of 9.4 months (95% CI, 7.8–11.0) and a median OS of 23.0 months (95% CI, 20.6–25.3) 64…”
Section: Panitumumab In the Elderly Populationmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…Another sub-group post-hoc analysis of 110 patients over 65 years old treated in clinical trials with a combination of panitumumab and poly-chemotherapy was reported by the Hellenic group HORG. Response rate was 56.4% with a median PFS of 9.4 months and a median OS of 23.0 months [76]. Finally, the NCIC group analyzed cetuximab versus best supportive care (CO.17 study) or a combination of brivanib and cetuximab (CO.20 study) in patients with chemo-resistant disease.…”
Section: Anti Egfr Antibodiesmentioning
confidence: 99%