2018
DOI: 10.1159/000494053
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficacy of Magnifying Narrow Band Imaging for Delineating Horizontal Margins of Early Gastric Cancer

Abstract: <b><i>Background/Aims:</i></b> The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of magnifying narrow-band imaging (M-NBI) with histopathological confirmation in identifying the demarcation line (DL) of early gastric cancer (EGC). <b><i>Methods:</i></b> EGCs resected by endoscopic submucosal dissection after identifying the DL using M-NBI following histopathological confirmation were included. After determining the DL for the entire EGC lesion using M… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study, the negative resection rate of horizontal margin after ESD and surgery was 97.4% (95% CI: 92.1%-1.0%) though there were almost no difference between that of UD-type EGC and D-type EGC. The negative resection rate of HM was found to be higher than the delineation accuracy of EGC margins, which may be due to the second biopsy after the first positive biopsy [ 17 ], and the extended resection is usually 5 mm outside the margin [ 33 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this study, the negative resection rate of horizontal margin after ESD and surgery was 97.4% (95% CI: 92.1%-1.0%) though there were almost no difference between that of UD-type EGC and D-type EGC. The negative resection rate of HM was found to be higher than the delineation accuracy of EGC margins, which may be due to the second biopsy after the first positive biopsy [ 17 ], and the extended resection is usually 5 mm outside the margin [ 33 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, ME-NBI was also deemed useful in delineating the horizontal margin of EGC [ 6 , 7 ], although its diagnostic accuracy was variable from 69% to 100% [ 9 18 ]. The capacity for demarcating the margins of EGC correctly by ME-NBI might be influenced by Helicobacter pylori ( H. pylori ) statues [ 12 , 16 ], tumor-occupied site [ 17 ], and tumor size [ 17 ], among other factors. Therefore, the primary purpose of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of ME-NBI for the demarcation of EGC margins.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, in the M-BLI-BC group, a clear DL was preoperatively diagnosed using M-BLI and biopsies taken in 4 directions from background noncancerous tissue ≈ 5 mm outside the EGC lesion for histopathological confirmation according to our previous study (Fig. 1d–i; Video 1) [7]. When biopsy specimens were diagnosed as adenocarcinoma, the DL was rediagnosed at a later date and ESD was performed after the biopsy specimen was diagnosed as noncancerous tissue.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We conventionally perform biopsy confirmation in 4 directions from background mucosa surrounding the lesion to prevent as much error as possible in the determination of the DL in addition to M-NBI because there was not enough evidence of M-NBI diagnosis. In our previous retrospective study, the diagnostic accuracy of M-NBI in identifying the DL of EGCs was 98.1% in well-differentiated EGCs and the rate of negative horizontal margins in ESD specimens was achieved to be 99.2% by biopsy confirmation [7]. Therefore, biopsy confirmation was not needed for all the well-differentiated EGCs after diagnosis of the DL using M-NBI.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, several studies have demonstrated that M-NBI endoscopy improves the determination of horizontal extent before ESD in patients with an unclear margin of EGC[ 63 , 64 ]. Horii et al[ 65 ] showed that diagnostic accuracy using M-NBI was 96.7% when the successful demarcation of EGC was evaluated on the basis of the biopsy-negative rate outside the tumor. Complete resection of EGC with a tumor-negative horizontal margin was achieved in 97.9% ( n = 323/330).…”
Section: Early Gastric Cancermentioning
confidence: 99%